If he did do it, it would help us all achieve some kind of collective closure if he confessed, it seems to me. But really, who knows for sure? Are you convinced one way or the other? Can our pop-media society ever let this one go?
2006-11-17 15:18:11 · 19 answers · asked by just me 2 in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
Hi, If you believe in Science you have to know that OJ is guilty. DNA proved that. Only because of a biased jury did he get aquitted. Why must we have to endure anymore of OJ's narcissistic behavior? Has anyone put any thought into what this must be doing emotionally to Nicole and Ron's families, not to mention what it is doing to his children. I feel like OJ, besides killing Ron and Nicole, has raped the justice system and now he is raping the public. Shame on Fox TV for airing such a show. Shame on book publishers for publishing such trash, and shame on the American public for watching this show or buying this book. I can't believe how low some people will stoop for a dollar. Let's put OJ where he belongs, into obscurity, which for a narcissist is worse than prison, and ban the book and TV show. Kim Goldman(Ron's sister) has a website you can go to and sign a petition that will be given to officials at Fox and Harper-Collins Publishers to urge them to not air the show or sell the book. The website is: http://dontpayoj.com
2006-11-18 20:03:02 · answer #1 · answered by sunshinesue_1999 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
OJ's trial took place just as DNA evidence was beginning to be used in trials. Juries who were not scientists didn't really understand it and give it the weight it deserved. Today in a world where CSI is so all-encompassing, almost everybody knows that DNA evidence is pretty solid proof. I believe if a jury made up of today's public were deciding the same case with the same evidence, they would find OJ guilty. However, I believe everyone had just written it off as a tragic miscarriage of justice until he decided to throw himself into the spotlight again. It seems OJ himself is reluctant to let society forget he got away with murder.
2006-11-17 23:28:31 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
What if there is a Santa Claus? Is this a possibility? If he didn't do it then no one would watch this dumb tv show or read the sick book. The only reason people WILL do either is because they know he did it. I mean, would anyone watch a tv show or read a book that you did, to say how the two victims were murdered? Faux and Regan the publisher are only able to make blood $$ on this because they know he did it. Otherwise, it is just some dumb - - - - - - talking about how he would busta couple of whiteys - and we can listen to any hip hop tune to get that crap.
2006-11-17 23:29:54 · answer #3 · answered by commonsense 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I never was sure...What I am sure of IS WHY he would now write a book on IF I DID DO IT?
What about the family...of the victims..his children...Makes you wonder if he needs to take care of some guilt feelings..maybe only way he can talk about it..without confessing. Be honest before I thought he was innocent..now am wondering if I came to the wrong conclusion!
2006-11-18 00:33:23 · answer #4 · answered by Joanne J 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Noooo....I would not consider that a possibility.
A man that didn't do it would never consider writing a book, If I Did It, this is how I would have did it.
A man that cared about his children would not write a book like this. A man that cared about the other victim's family would not have wrote a book like this. A man with any morals would not write a book like this.
Its all about OJ and money. So you see he isn't a man, just a vicious killer.
2006-11-17 23:36:20 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
right, who really can know. How do we know Kennedy was really assasinated, maybe it was all a hoax, how do we really know we landed on the moon, maybe it was a staged production, how do we know anything. Right, who knows for sure? Because so many things can be a 1 in a million possibility, then why cant anything be possible.
Idiot.
OJ was acquitted because the jury was predominantly black, and they were sending a message to white society "since we havent gotten a fair shake in the justice system, we are going to send a message, regardless of whether he did it or not". Thats all there was to his acquittal.
2006-11-17 23:30:28 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Cali courts had to do a little soft shoe on that one. Can you image the riot that would have taken place after a thumbs down on that one. I believe this crime can be solved quite easily with the judicious use of Achems Razor.
2006-11-17 23:30:06 · answer #7 · answered by Joe Schmo from Kokomo 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Simpson's hubris and megalomania will eventually do him in. Of course he did it; he's a psychopathic cretin who believes himself to be above the law and smarter than anyone else. He will kill again....and the next time, he'll get caught.
Anyone who buys his books disrespects the memories of Nicole Simpson and Ron Goldman. Let O.J. rot in Hell. -RKO-
2006-11-17 23:22:31 · answer #8 · answered by -RKO- 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think the reasoning of a jury with all the data outweighs a personal opinion, so I think he's innocent.
2006-11-18 21:40:45 · answer #9 · answered by clamcrunchies2 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Oh sure. I'd consider that a possibility ... if I were certifiably insane or just plain stupid.
Have you read the evidence?
2006-11-17 23:21:49 · answer #10 · answered by Beejee 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋