how graphic is it?
2006-11-17 13:20:03 · 5 answers · asked by sid 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
I agree with ag_rams It was more action than Bond.
and Daniel Craig does not stand out in the crowd the way the others do.
2006-11-17 15:05:37 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
It's a great film. And a good Bond film, besides. Easily the best since Goldeneye, perhaps better. In the top 3 Bond actors, without a doubt.
The torture scene is basically Bond strapped naked to a chair. There is no bottom to the chair, just a rim. The villain repeatedly pounds his testicles with a carpet beater. Obviously you don't see the impact, but you hear Bond's screams of pain (and, later, as a means of defience, his screaming "Yes! Yes! To the right!" etc.) It's obvious what's going on. Scene isn't excessively violent but it did make me wince. Lasts less than 5 minutes.
2006-11-20 04:03:14 · answer #2 · answered by Lance 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not very. It's not a long a sequence either. It's a very good movie. Daniel Craig could not be hotter.
Good balance of action and story. I recommend it highly.
2006-11-17 13:57:42 · answer #3 · answered by Tuckstop 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes there is, but, but this is more than likely the very worst bond film ever made. In fact I think this is just an action film and NOT a Bond film
2006-11-17 13:27:57 · answer #4 · answered by ag_rams 1 · 1⤊ 2⤋
pretty graphic. i think the movie is pretty good though...
2006-11-17 13:29:50 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋