If you had one week to travel through Europe, what countries/cities are MUST SEE?

Answer 1

One week is quite short for Europe but I would try something like this.

Arrive in Paris - spend 2 days
Take the Thalys to Brussels - spend 1 day
Make a daytrip with train to Brugge(if you have time and forces you can take the train to Oostende) and return to Brussels - 1 day
Take the Thalys to Amsterdam - spend 2 days
Take the Thalys to Cologne - spend 1 day

This way you see 4 countries and 5 cities

This is the most efficient way to see many places but if you ask my top 5 "must see" cities in Europe they would be:

1. Paris
2. Rome
3. Istanbul
4. London
5. Barcelona

Answer 2

A week is way too short, but Paris, London, Venice, Prague and Istanbul (especially Istanbul) would top my list.

Second tier would be Florence, Rome, Amsterdam, Berlin, Budapest, St. Petersburg, Athens.

Third level - Dublin, Edinburgh, Antwerp, Naples, Krakow, Dubrovnik, Sarajevo, Moscow.

Been to them all except Berlin, Budapest, St.P and the last 4.

Answer 3

Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Brussels, Belgium; Berlin, Germany; anywhere in Switzerland; Venice, Italy; Athens, Greece

Answer 4

One week is very, very short. Rather than wasting half of your trip travelling from one place to the next, stick to one major city and its surroundings. I've gone on a ten-day trip to Paris, a week-long trip to Rome, a two-week long trip to London, and never got bored in any of those places.

You're far better off getting well-acquainted with a city and appreciating its people, history and culture, as opposed to going on a whirlwind tour or a bunch of places, barely scratching the surface of each one.

Answer 5

London. Cologne, Berlin, Venice, Rome, Florence, Paris, Vienna.

Answer 6

i might propose no longer seeing a diverse united states a week. some international places have plenty to ensure that only one week does not appear like sufficient. you will possibly have a stressful time finding out on only one week in Italy, as an occasion, without lacking out on a brilliant sort of invaluable places. and you gets a greater effective journey in case you spend greater time in fewer places - that's much less time vacationing around, much less time in trains and practice stations, and greater time to take exhilaration on your ecosystem, meet community human beings, and notice issues different than only the main well-known vacationer factors of interest. i might in many circumstances prefer a minimum of three finished days in any considerable city if possible. My recommendations for cities in Europe are London, Paris, Rome, Florence, Venice, Barcelona, Amsterdam, Prague, Vienna, and Berlin. in case you prefer to pass slightly farther afield, Marrakesh, Jerusalem, and Istanbul are all dazzling. And there are some super places that are actually not cities, like the Swiss Alps and Greek Islands, and a brilliant sort of pleasing smaller cities or small cities in the time of Europe like Siena, Rothenburg, Bruges, Aix-en-Provence, and Lucerne.

Answer 7

Just a week? Do an in-depth trip to one city - Rome or Paris. That's the only way to get to know a place. Breezing through is a waste of your time and money, in my opinion.

Answer 8

Amsterdam, The netherlands
But not for the popular reason of being allowed to smoke pot. It is a beautiful city with canals and art and great candy called droppies! Great cheese also.

Answer 9

Stuttgart, Germany

Answer 10

One week is definitely not enough but I'd go to Italy especially to Venice and Rome then Dubrovnik then Spain