"I think therefore i am" "I am therefore i think" Explain "i".?

Question

DO NOT explain the words of Descartes and Spinoza. Explain in your own words the subject- "I".

Answer 1

The best answer I can think of is to give site Kant or Hinduism to explain it.

The anology I use is that just like an eyeball cannot see itself but only through a mirror, for example; "I" cannot comprehend "itself." The real "I" or what Kant calls it Transcendental Self is something we can NEVER know. That's probably the best possible answer that the world has ever been able to come up with so far.

Answer 2

The light is the only difference between a candlestick and a candle. The light in a candle was not visible before the candle was lit, and it would not be visible even now if there were nothing around to illuminate - light by it self is invisible. Without a candle there would be no light and without things to illuminate the light would be remain unnoticed. Now, if the flame of the candle is the mind of the candle then light is its thought – the thought that sees and at the same times enables all to see what it sees.

Or may be we are like a sale boat in the middle of an ocean with limitless skies above and immeasurable depths below. There is nothing but water all around. We know only so much of this ocean and the rest is unknown. Now, the 'I' is the voyager or the sailor upon that boat – the ancient mariner on an eternal journey toward some unknown destination that he calls his home.

There is an endless universe all around us, but our inner depths are equally immense. We, as we know each other, are like an interface between the world we know and the world that we do not know – to know something absolutely is to be that thing. Our life is like an interface between what we essentially are and what this world is. The ever-spreading circle of light, our mind, is the house of our consciousness and awareness. And the 'I' is the operator in that mind.

Our thoughts are created before we actually become aware of them, and this is the reason that they are organised and sequential. Thoughts come to us or ‘I’. The 'I' is the rational self that holds the seat of wisdom and ensures the application of our entire knowledge into the world that we know or is under our investigation. The 'I' does not know the entire inner self and neither it knows all that is the world but 'I' is fully interested and wakeful where these two worlds meet and interact to be one.

Answer 3

These are the statements that led to the simple and basic
question, so often asked in Yahoo Answers. It is the most
simple state of philosophy, which is "Does a tree make a
noise when it falls?! "Yes it does, I can hear it therefore I
exist"

In this simple question, a common physical object is inserted
in order to better explain the subjective "I" into an objective
and existing "I". Which is exclusive to mankind, since other
animals "do hear" but do not know why nor what to do about
the noise, nor why it was heard. This illustrates the difference
of "instinct" from "conscious thought", for man has both and
beast has only instinct.

Answer 4

nicely, you on occasion see "scientists have got here across DNA is an complicated helix. basically clever beings can devise such complicated issues, as a result clever layout is genuine." that's hassle-free to apply awareness from the "different portion of the fence" and then turn it on your strengthen. They wish that people who're attentive to those 3 arguments, and have a greater atheistic or scientific point of view, are gobsmacked by the argument and not waiting to assert one be conscious anymore. It must be suggested that no longer basically those specific theists you point out, use this pathological way of thinking to create their needed consequence. There are human beings from all factors of all varieties of fences who use this way of thinking to create the outcomes they like to realize. Their view is only distorted into examining basically what they like to ascertain and ignoring different information, then coming to a end and then putting their end loose at something of the worldwide, of their very own approach, to "open their eyes." the superb thank you to realize that's p.c.. out theories or experiments that are actually not finished yet, universal generalisations or subjective words. as an occasion; we don't recognize what occurred to create the universe. that doesn't unavoidably mean that God did it; it only capacity we don't yet have the supplies to check out it completely. There are human beings engaged on it on the instant. and so on... Now the humorous element approximately this way of thinking and argumenting, is that it infrequently ever gets those people who initiate it, their needed consequence; and while confronted with somebody who's greater knowledgeable contained in the sector they're discussing, they in many circumstances get greater desirable than they bargained for. As you likely nicely recognize ^_^

Answer 5

It's what is present in every cognition, whether the mental content is true or false.

Hume disputes it.

Kant calls it the unity of apperception

I, the self, is an indexical referrent: what am I referring to when I use it? it is not clear, but the usage of "I" is pervasive enough, we should have a general understanding of it: it must contain my subjective, phenomenal point of view -- that which is necessary even for delusion.

Answer 6

"I" has been completely and thoroughly explained in Sartre's concept of "Self", and the "I AM", in his quintessential work "Being and Nothingness"

What Socrates and Spinoza did not take into account is that there is no "I" if there is no "Other". For this exmplanation, I thank Sartre and Levinas.

Answer 7

I = the centre = the nucleus - how could anything ever be without a start or a beginning?

I = infinity = for I

if I = 0 = then I does not exist = therefore I is infinity......

erm..... i think

hehe

helen x x x

Answer 8

That would be the spirit. The spirit is the only one with intelligence not the brain. Our body is just a casing a beautiful piece of machinery that helps us demonstrate life.Peace and love be with you.

Answer 9

I see all. I make and am made by All. I am the centre point of the universe and all of it at once. I am an eye.

Answer 10

my personal definition of 'I', is me or my. its not about who but i as in it signifies me as a person, an individual, a human being. the concept of what is human, what it is that i am about, what is the purpose of me existing and questioning my actions, decisions, motives, the choices i make, the significance of those actions, decisions etc and asks why i made them or gone ahead with them, in addition to what premonitions, predicaments and events took place and occurred prior to those actions, decisions etc