2006-11-17 12:13:30 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Business & Finance ➔ Careers & Employment
I take my hat off to firefighters; Heroes all;Got to have'um. And they might get shot at once in a while by a crazy who will pop off a few rounds and receded again into the dark shadows of an alley way.
Marines not only get shot at on a continuing and regular basis, they must endure the rigors of seaborne passage only to end the trip with a full frontal combat assault. (Yeah, I know, that's getting kinda John Wayneish) I guess the baddest of the bad would be a Marine firefighter. I raise my glass to both and say I appreciate them very much.
2006-11-17 12:27:06 · answer #1 · answered by Joe Schmo from Kokomo 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Between the end of Vietnam to the Iraq invastion, fireman was a lot more dangerous. Marines had a few dangerous missions here and there, but firefighters had danger everyday. Since 2003, I think the marines in Iraq have it a lot more dangerous. Crazy suicadal Iraqis more dangerous than fire.
2006-11-17 12:52:34 · answer #2 · answered by errai14 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A marine that is a firefighter
2006-11-17 12:14:54 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
nicely..the casualty fees are greater contained in the militia than they're for firefighters.. So i might say plenty.. they're nevertheless the two risky and honorable jobs. It additionally relies upon (needless to say) on the place you serve. in the adventure that your seeking to be a firefighter contained in the militia, the Coast take care of or military might desire to probably use you. And that seems much less risky than the marines.
2016-10-04 02:19:31 · answer #4 · answered by vishvanath 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Marine!
2006-11-17 12:14:41 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
marines are, theyre the first on enemy land and the last branch of the service to leave. but dont get me wrong a firemans job is still dangerous just not as dangerous as the good Ol' leathernecks
2006-11-17 12:23:51 · answer #6 · answered by Philly fan 4 life 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Statistically would have to be a firefighter. A FF is injured probably 20-30% more often per "mission" and have lots more missions.
2006-11-17 12:22:22 · answer #7 · answered by sethsdadiam 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would say both are equal in dangerous...If I had to choose one I would be a marine, because you will be serving for our freedom!
2006-11-17 12:16:09 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Being on the fire department in the Marines.
2006-11-17 12:15:43 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Marine for sure, they are sent in first in any dangerous circumstance.
2006-11-17 12:15:15 · answer #10 · answered by Pashta 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋