Even though I support trade, and full diplomatic recognition of Vietnam.....there's a lot of unanswered questions.
Mia's need to be accounted for.....BEFORE we have full ties to Vietnam. The Vietnam conflict was a somber tale in our history. The brave Americans that died there need to be brought home.
2006-11-17 13:01:15
·
answer #1
·
answered by Villain 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
In the 90s Senators John McCain (a former POW) and John Kerry went on a fact finding tour of Vietnam and issued a bipartisan report finding that Vietnam was not holding any POWs. The Vietnam war has been over for over thirty years. There is no reason to hold POWs after a war is over.
2006-11-17 19:13:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by wyldfyr 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
POW Problem - we don't have a POW problem. Why would a coward who was afraid to fight in the Vietnam War give a crap one way or the other about a non-existent POW problem? If he doesn't know about it, how could he ask about it? And, its highly unlikely his handlers even mentioned it. The truth is - we'll probably never know.
2006-11-17 20:05:18
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
He is too much of a caoward to do so the confrence is about cheap labor disguised as free trade with the enemy who still has yet to account for all the POW/MIAs!
Bring them home or send us back
2006-11-17 19:31:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by paulisfree2004 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Bush was never in Vietnam, he was in the air national guard to get out of it.
2006-11-17 19:00:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by iccelou91 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
What POW issue is that.
2006-11-17 19:00:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by Dr. NG 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
Probably. What makes you think he didn't?
2006-11-17 18:59:42
·
answer #7
·
answered by yupchagee 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't know I wasn't there and neither were you, or were you..
2006-11-17 19:02:02
·
answer #8
·
answered by glasgow girl 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
YES!
2006-11-17 19:21:48
·
answer #9
·
answered by daydoom 5
·
0⤊
0⤋