hmmmm, good question, idk, ive never thought of that... i dont think so because their strong enough that the one that would be sucked into the other would be strong enough to keep itself from getting sucked in... however, that could work the other way too, their strong enough that the one thats sucking it inwould be strong enough to do it, y'know?? but that brings up another question, which black hole is getting sucked in??wouldnt they both be sucking eachother in therfore getting rid of both black holes from ever existing??but then where would they go after they both suck eachother up?? wow, thats mindboggling, anyway, good luck on finding out the answer, i think you found one question that cant be answered.
2006-11-17 10:20:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes. That is very unlikely to happen though. Black holes are caused by very large stars, much larger than our sun. The likelihood of two of these being in close enough proximity to one another is rare. Given the fact that the universe is expanding, it is even more unlikely. About the only way it could happen is if 2 galaxies collided, which does happen, and black holes within those galaxies crossed pathes.
2006-11-17 10:13:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes, though it will ultimately affect the longevity of the black hole, as holes outside of a certain size range are not stable. I forget exactly what the reasons are, but as I remember, the really tiny ones just evaporate (by means of so-called Hawking radiation, in which virtual particles form outside the event horizon in the quantum foam, and one with negative mass falls back into the black hole), and the really big ones do something else that's unstable... but I forget what it is.
2006-11-17 10:15:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by Don M 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I guess it can. There is no known case when two black holes meet. I can tell you that the savants aproved that nearby the black holes the relation space-time is extremely different from our relation. I read somewhere that black holes are "gates" through time.( ex: it can send you 1000 years back in the past ). So, maybe a black hole can send another black hole in future or past, and so on...
2006-11-17 10:21:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by Alex 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, but it's extremely unlikley. A black hole is a collapsed star. The first black hole would probably suck in the other star before it could ever become a black hole.
2006-11-17 14:38:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Wrong I am certain that a black hole is middle of each Galaxy. I think that there is 2 Galaxy colliding but I cant remember the name.
sorry about that but at my age what u expect.
2006-11-17 11:15:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by JOHNNIE B 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
i've got in simple terms study the previous seven solutions, and aside from the obtrusive element that the closest black hollow is in simple terms too far away to get to, not one of the solutions are transforming into to be to the midsection of the project. in case you have been close adequate to a black hollow to toss in a digital camera, a surprising component might take place. out of your attitude, the digital camera might sluggish because it approached the progression horizon, the sunshine achieving you from the digital camera might improve into redder and redder, and corresponding to the digital camera might improve into fainter and fainter. in reality, out of your attitude, the digital camera might by no ability attain the progression horizon, by way of fact the great gravity there might sluggish time to a end, stretch out the sunshine waves as much as now as to cause them to invisible, and make corresponding to the digital camera so faint which you are able to no longer see it. this is actual weird and wonderful, by way of fact the digital camera itself would not be conscious something amiss because it crossed the progression horizon. Then it would be stretched right into a skinny string via gravity. As for what's interior a black hollow, no one rather knows. Einstein's equations, that are ordinary to be an incomplete description, call for a singularity on the midsection, a dimensionless element with countless mass. If the black hollow is quiescent, no longer being fed via an accretion disk, each little thing interior the progression horizon isn't something yet empty area surrounding the invisible singularity. If the black hollow is being fed, no person is for specific what occurs, yet in accordance to three scientists, the midsection is roiling with ability and remember traveling in the final direction of the singularity yet each so often bouncing returned upward in direction of the progression horizon by way of mammoth density.
2016-10-22 06:45:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Certainly
2006-11-17 15:37:32
·
answer #8
·
answered by savvy s 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
That (two blackholes combining into one) is a major theory to explain Gamma Ray Bursts (GRB).
2006-11-17 11:01:49
·
answer #9
·
answered by ramshi 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Two positives make a negative so you end up with a white hole!
2006-11-18 03:17:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by Billy Butthead 7
·
2⤊
0⤋