Is that often something useful most people can learn and apply fairly, or is it more often a tool for rationalizing personal paranoias? Are you reading between the lines and finding the truth or exaggerating what wasn't directly said? What about the in between lines that may be from errors and not itended?
My bias on this is, I will admit, that reading between the lines is an inherently flawed technique that is best used with great caution.
What do you think?
2006-11-17 10:03:31 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
=as a professional, I tend to listen to the unspoken vs the spoken and read body language as well.. both are very telling and helpful to my client.
2006-11-17 14:51:47 · answer #1 · answered by sunshinysusan 7 · 6⤊ 0⤋
I think people read between the lines . To assume what they want to believe .. More on the lines like tunnel vision.
This is why you should always assume quitely and never out loud
2006-11-17 18:07:32 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Things would generally proceed much better if people didn't try to read between the lines.
That's how rumours - lies even - get started.
Take people at their word, or move on.
2006-11-17 18:06:18 · answer #3 · answered by Up your Maslow 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
in between lines u can see half truth
2006-11-17 18:07:11 · answer #4 · answered by george p 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋