2006-11-17 07:12:34 · 10 answers · asked by I'm Sparticus 4 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Television
Ding, dong Rhapsody
2006-11-17 07:32:08 · update #1
Yes, ordering us to pay for their shite channels or go to court and pay a fine. Barstards, it shouldn't be allowed.
2006-11-17 07:16:07 · answer #1 · answered by Rhapsody 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I'm not sure. If I want information on anything, it tends to be the BBC that I refer to. As the producer that's been around the longest, I find them to be a more reliable source than many of these flimsy channels that come and go. They tend to just show reality shows all the time.
2006-11-17 07:17:53 · answer #2 · answered by kpk 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
too right! they've got the cheek to fine and send people to prison even though there is nothing but crap on that channel- and still they expect us to watch that shite and pay for the licence fee. its an utter joke. if the bbc was publicly run, the first thing we'd do is scrap the licence fee, put on adverts and axe the rubbish that is on our screens
2006-11-17 07:25:19 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know but their news shows more truth than America's CNN. Even if the reporters a jerk, they still allow some to express their feelings without cutting them off.
2006-11-17 07:29:11 · answer #4 · answered by Marissa H 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
At the moment it is run by Marxists, but they will be got rid of.
2006-11-17 07:15:02 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know what **** is. I wonder how many do have their heads there.
2006-11-18 02:46:30 · answer #6 · answered by *** The Earth has Hadenough*** 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
That's cos it doesn't know its head from its anus.
2006-11-17 07:27:25 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yeah.. they keep making rubbish that doesn't make sense
2006-11-17 07:14:58 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
no just how licence money.
2006-11-17 07:22:42 · answer #9 · answered by peter o 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
probably
2006-11-17 07:13:49 · answer #10 · answered by Ally 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋