now that bushs approval rating has hit a new low, 31%, can we now say whoever voted for him is to blame?

Question

you put him there, not me

Answer 1

If he is not your president and you live in the United States then you should go some where else, its a UNITED State, not divided. Go to a foreign country where there are not as many freedoms that we have and then compare your life there to life here. You are to blame for his low approval rating. Someone who likes to complain but does not know all the facts but has all the answers.

Answer 2

I certainly did. And I am most proud of it!

History will judge his Presidency with more honesty than you ever could. Historically great Presidents faced opposition consisting of slurs and lies from your kind and rose above it.

I trust George to keep us safe even while he ignores approval ratings.

George Bush isn't Bill Clinton. George does what a President should do because that's the Presidents job. Clinton did what he did for money and approval and that's not how a President should act. So who is the better President? The one who worries about ratings or the one who acts for the good of the nation inspite of ratings?

Answer 3

I love the goofuses who are still pro-Bush. Remember how smug they were after the election in '04? How they said we needed Bush's "strong leadership" in case there was another disaster. Then, of course, came Katrina. A level 5 hurricane barreling down on the Gulf Coast, and Bush doesn't think it is worth ending a vacation over....Not to mention the deficit. Iraq. Wages. Healthcare. History will not be kind.....

Answer 4

So what. If i bear in mind that as without delay as GWB develop into as against artwork, indoors the 1st 3 hundred and sixty 5 days earlier 9/11 his scores have been by the floor. by the point of 9/11 2001, GWB develop into already finding like a lame duck president. Its in spite of if early days for Obama. you will desire to ask this question back 2 days earlier the subsequent presidential election in 2012.

Answer 5

Polls are usually inaccurate. You can get just about any result based on how you word the questions and in which order you ask them.

Since there are millions of polls and surveys every year, and I have never been polled nor do I know anyone who has every been polled, I have to wonder how accurate they are? Are they asking the same people over and over? Some surveys do.

I put him there, and I'm proud!

Answer 6

NOW we can. The first time he was elected (actually stole the election, but who's counting) I couldn't really blame people for their choice, but the second time around, the facts were there. That he lied to bring us into this war, that he had a chance to finish off the Taliban and catch bin Laden and decided not to, that he cut funding for our veterans....on and on and on. The facts were there and these idiots voted him in anyway. (they actually stole this one too) Yes, as far as I'm concerned, if you voted for Bush the second time around, you're guilty of the slaughter and neglect of our American service men and women as much as Bush is.

Answer 7

Could have done that from day 1. Remember though......he still won by getting MORE votes than Mr Heinz....oh I mean Mr Edwards.

Answer 8

The only people that are left with Bush are the ones who drank the cool-aid.

Answer 9

hah noo.. whoever said SO YOU VOTED FOR KERRY???? LMAO!!!!!... i totally agree with you.. kerry is the freakin liar. whoever voted for kerry is soo stupid... if you couldn't see that kerry was the liar clearly then you are soo damn stupid.. you couldn't get any stupider if you didn't see it. obviously the ppl didn't see he was a liar were democrats. soo yeahh ya'll out there are blindd!!!!!!

Answer 10

i actully am not registered to vote but i have ALWAYS blamed the voters! but think of it like this; someone probably payed to have him get in office useing tax payers money.... they just don't know that