Check out two different screen shots. The first is from the PS3 first person shooter: Resistance: Fall of Man
http://image.com.com/gamespot/images/2006/317/reviews/928399_20061114_screen012.jpg
And the following from the 360s Gears of War:
http://image.com.com/gamespot/images/2006/310/reviews/928234_20061107_screen044.jpg
I'm sorry, but you're smoking crack if you can claim that the PS3 graphics are superior. Gears of War is hands down much more detailed than Resistance. So far, 360 is looking better.
2006-11-17 07:04:28 · 5 answers · asked by Shane L 3 in Games & Recreation ➔ Video & Online Games
GOW 360, ps3 grafs are not going to be much better than 360, hands down.
2006-11-17 07:09:41 · answer #1 · answered by 99 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Most people, and me personally, think the PS3 is slightly more powerful. Look it up at wikipedia.org. check out the power of each one. Gears of War is an amazing looking game, they both are but a Resistance:FOM is just as nice if not better. Resistance has to be good as a launch title to show off the power of the PS3 and to show what the PS3 can do so don't put Resistance down yet. But again both games and both systems are amazing to some it could be an opinion thing.
2006-11-17 15:11:58 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Give the PS3 a year and they will catch up- these are release games
But for now, XBOX360 is better
2006-11-17 15:13:09 · answer #3 · answered by BigD 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
umm...well...since I havent seen what the PS3 has to handle...
I would still go with XBOX 360 probably.
only because from what I've seen and experienced...totally awesome.
2006-11-17 15:15:58 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
What? Is it "Stupid Question Day" today? PS2 and PS3 graphics are better than X-BOX! But then again, I'm all about Playstation in general. Not to mention, this "IS" only my opinion. GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO PLAYSTATION!!!!!
WHOOOHH!!!
2006-11-17 15:29:34 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋