English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

....the 20th century? Among the physicists, Werner Heisenberg, Max Planck, Louis de Broglie, Niels Bohr, Erwin Schrödinger, Max Born, John von Neumann, Paul Dirac, Albert Einstein, Wolfgang Pauli and others. Among the psychologists, Carl Jung and Sigmund Freud.

2006-11-17 07:04:24 · 5 answers · asked by Seeker 4 in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

5 answers

I would certainly agree that their work has inspired some very interesting and important philosophical debates, but in most cases they did not have enough academic background in philosophy to deeply address many of the philosophical issues involved. They got the ball rolling, philosophically, but they didn't necessarily follow up with much philosophical rigor. Their work was, of course, deep and rigorous within their disciplines of science, but to be taken serious as PHILOSOPHERS they would have to engage the specifically philosophical implications in more detail and show how their work relates to other philosophical approaches. This work tends to get left to the philosophers of science.

2006-11-17 10:51:13 · answer #1 · answered by eroticohio 5 · 5 0

If our factor of self reference is irradiated, what are you supposing would journey happiness? Overcoming the ego can are available 2 types. the 1st is proper to the existence of a monastic, and is a attitude of ignoring the ego and letting it settle into organic expertise. the 2d is proper to somebody residing in the international, and is a attitude of actual nourishing the ego so as that that's balanced and identifies with the completed universe. the 1st is renounce to the totality, the 2d is swallowing all this is with "Self". In the two cases, oneness with actuality is located out, yet ego suppression for a householder will bring about severe character issues. this is why spirituality in the international is so muddled, human beings attempt to stay a existence in the international whilst following the policies of a monk. The Vedic custom eve has info of differing interpretations of sacred texts and tenant finding on no rely if one needs to offer up the international or embody it as an expression of self. working example, a monk is meant to be thoroughly celibate, whilst a householder is meant tor regulate loss of semen in a diverse way that makes it possible for actual intimacy with ones better half.

2016-10-15 16:27:49 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Some of the people you mentioned wore sweaters more often than sweatshirts. Einstein, Planck, and Pauli were known for their chic headwear. It's unlikely that any of them deserved a hood.

2006-11-20 10:03:43 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes.

2006-11-17 07:11:17 · answer #4 · answered by producer_vortex 6 · 0 0

yes i would

2006-11-21 04:29:03 · answer #5 · answered by Talking Hat 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers