English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

will you still love someone who does not or cannot promote your survival and agree with your point if view?

2006-11-17 07:03:44 · 10 answers · asked by zigzagidiot 3 in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

so, Red Angel what you are claiming is that you would love el kaida or the woman who stole your boyfriend/huspand or your worst imagined enemy?

2006-11-17 07:13:35 · update #1

10 answers

What an excellent question....If I could I would give you 10 points for asking it...Excellent !!! really excellent. Something I would definitely contemplate over a glass of Cognac. (Hennessey of course!) Those I love don't always agree with me...and my survival is not dependent on any ones love but my own. Receiving love from others certainly does inspire me to give more of my love to them! The principle of reciprocity I think....

2006-11-17 13:24:30 · answer #1 · answered by Brains & Beauty 6 · 0 1

To truely be loved by another, your point of view must at least be respected & shared in your lifes ideals. I can not love someone who does not promote my survival & although they don't have to agree with me on trivial things, I believe without real honest respect for my point of views, they do not know me therefore do not truely love me. My opinions and views are too much of who I am.
I don't think the two could be seperated. To love me is to love my point of view.
Obviously, I do not wish for someone to agree with the colour of drapes that I pick or who is the hottest tv celebrity etc but I don't think that's what we're talking about here.

2006-11-17 16:05:40 · answer #2 · answered by punkvixen 5 · 0 0

well i think sometimes we might love or be loved by a person who doesnt believe in our concepts or points of view ... sometimes its not how u think ... its how u act and treat people ..how u can help and make others feel better when they are down .... your personality... thats wut gets someone in love with you sometimes ...
i do agree that there must be a general frame that you both should be within ... but that doesnt mean you have to agree on everything .. not even most of it ... and i think a person who is different from you can help promote your survival bcoz he gives you a chance to see what other people think .. a chance to say your opinion .. debate on an issue ...

2006-11-17 08:02:22 · answer #3 · answered by DuDeTte 2 · 0 0

i'm not getting this question.......if someone doesn't promote your survival - then they can't care much about you, so who the hell cares whether they agree with my point of view. If my point of view was, that I didn't promote my own survival because I didn't care, I sure wouldn't want anyone agreeing with my point of view, because ultimately, I'm not sure I really would want to get dead. So, I think it's always got to go back to being loved, because if someone loves you, they do care if you survive and they care about me enough to trust me with their honesty, that they didn't agree with me.

2006-11-17 16:14:01 · answer #4 · answered by amuse4you 4 · 0 0

To be loved is the greatest need of all. Without it you become a very bitter person, and you have no respect for others. So i would have to say you really cannot have one without the other. Fundamental beliefs have to be shared in order for two people to truly love each other.

2006-11-18 01:11:50 · answer #5 · answered by Pardon Moi? 3 · 0 1

Ummm...am I crazy or doesn't someone who loves me also want me to SURVIVE? I think someone who wants me dead, isn't particularly fond of me...? You can't really choose either or since they have to go together! I think it's better to be loved by someone who promotes my survival and agrees with my viewpoint, as opposed to being hated by someone who wants me dead & disagrees with me fundamentally. Anyone who doesn't care about my wellbeing doesn't love me and doesn't even understand what love is!!!

Anyone who is contra-survival in any way & claims to love you, is lying. If you love someone, you don't destroy them.

2006-11-17 07:49:41 · answer #6 · answered by amp 6 · 1 0

Allen Hammond, author of "Which worldwide? circumstances for the twenty first Century" seems to me to coach Hobbesian impression. So does Madhal Gadgil, whom Hammond cites as an expert.

2016-10-04 02:05:17 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

what the hell kind of question is that? of course i would still love someone who doesnt think like i do, if we all thought the same thing,what would be the point?.. plus i can take care of my own survival, thanks...

2006-11-17 07:08:49 · answer #8 · answered by ? 6 · 1 1

To be loved.

2006-11-17 07:12:03 · answer #9 · answered by producer_vortex 6 · 0 0

To be loved!! Sometimes you NEED to be disagreed with, and sometimes you need to disagree with those you love.

2006-11-17 08:48:24 · answer #10 · answered by yumyum 6 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers