i say this in light of the dutch making it against the law to cover your face.
if you are islamic and answering this question what are your thoughts regarding this law.
2006-11-17 06:59:55 · 10 answers · asked by sofiarose 4 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
sorry decided to answer this question before I knew it had a Islamic overtone ..but to be honest no matter what faith you are think it would be economics ...... no money no bread...... no bread cant live ...... so survival kicks in no matter what the faith ...as to the dutch.....their country their law ...religion cant rule a country ....especially in the west as we are mostly Christin.....and democratic if the Islamic faith does eventually take over then it will be a democratic decision
2006-11-17 07:16:07 · answer #1 · answered by bobonumpty 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
In the United States, the "Freedom" Jefferson wrote about was actually financial. If you have money, you are free to choose. If you have no money, you are enslaved to your creditors.
*I'm beginning to feel like a broken record on this* The Constitution's first ammendment, "Freedom of Religion" was penned by Jefferson, Madison, and Jay. Originally, Patrick Henry was to be included, but he insisted that all men with voting rights be required to tithe a specific church. The others all agreed that such a requirement would make them (us) no better than the English who were required to pay homage to both the crown and the Church of England. And if you look at the church during the days of Henry VIII, you quickly see that they were one and the same. They convinced Patrick Henry to become the Governor for the state of Virginia and in so doing, deprived him of a say in the writing of this country's Constitution.
So, having said all of that (again). The answer to your question is "economic." Without money, you'll not be free to practice your chosen religion -- even if you choose no religion.
2006-11-17 07:21:02 · answer #2 · answered by Doc 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi grew to become right into a pre-eminent political and ideological chief of India in the process the Indian independence circulation. He pioneered satyagraha, resistance to tyranny with the aid of mass civil resistance. He grew to become into no longer a freedom fighter. are you able to tell me whilst he did a combat against absolutely everyone?
2016-10-22 06:33:07 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have total and complete religious freedom because i have no beliefs what so ever.
I also have been very successful so i have economic freedom too.
Looks like i win all round.
2006-11-17 07:04:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Freedom of all types is important... once we allow any freedom to become dominant or withdrawn we start the downward spiral to dictatorship, religious or economic... God or Mammon?
2006-11-17 07:05:32 · answer #5 · answered by Boring Old Fart 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Economic.
Religion is just a sop for the feeble minded.
2006-11-17 07:02:36 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I dont think it matters so much if you cover your face or not but im muslim. but what gets to me is that they talk of freedom of speech and all that **** but now you cant wear what you want? how does that one work out? i mean in what way does it effect anyone else? they are just clothes? right?
2006-11-17 07:04:25 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Neither my family and my self respect everything else is secondary...,,,
2006-11-17 09:05:40 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i AM NOT ISLAMIC, BUT i THINK THE DUTCH MADE THE RIGHT DESISION, THEY ARE VERY SENSIBLE PEOPLE
2006-11-17 12:40:15 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Why do I have to choose? Are they mutually exclusive?
2006-11-17 08:11:16 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋