Conflicts between the Powhatan and Virginia colonists increased when???

Question

when John Rolfe married Pocahontas, daughter of the leader of the Powhatan Confederacy.
after John Smith gained control of the colony in 1608.
because many colonists wanted to grow tobacco on American Indian lands.
after Opechancanough died in 1618.

those r the answers

Answer 1

Sometime after 1607a.d. Stop trying to punk
out and do the research for your homework.

Answer 2

it definitely isn't A because Pocahontas marrying John Rolfe was a good thing that brought peace for a few years.
it's not because John Smith gained control. He injured himself and went back to England, and was never in charge of Virginia.
Opechanacoanough lived until 1646, so that isn't even close to being right.
so the only answer left is the tobacco issue.

and according to wikipedia:
The initial colonial expansion, fueled by the desire to increase tobacco production, was one cause of the first colonial conflicts with Native Americans

so that's what I would choose
.

Answer 3

I think many people believe the two can be reconciled, or given their own "non-overlapping" fields, because in our society we are taught to look for compromise. Conflict or seeing a subject as mutually exclusive is seen as a failure - not being broad minded enough, being stubborn. I think that view is incorrect in this instance. We must consider, using no preconceived "correct" attitude, which of the two holds up as having the right answer. A survey of worldviews/beliefs will show that religion believes its worldview encompasses science. That science is a creation of man, who is a creation of God. This is how mainstream religions accept evolution, as the main example. A purely scientific worldview thinks it encompasses religion. Religion is a product of man's consciousness, which is a product of evolution. So religion is just one of many (all) things that are explained by a scientific worldview. After a lot of reading and thought, I have concluded that the second worldview is correct. I do not concede religion is a special case, set apart from all other forms of thought, given a special exception from the rules of evidence.