They used Lacrimosa from Mozart's Requiem. I can't decide if it's a good or a bad idea. What are your thoughts?
2006-11-17 05:45:10 · 13 answers · asked by Rhapsody 4 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Music
I think he is a bit like a god, especially if you compare him to Evanescence!!!
2006-11-17 05:50:39 · update #1
sac·ri·lege
sac·ri·lege [sákrəlij]
n
1. treating holy thing without respect: the violation, desecration, or theft of something considered holy or sacred
2. disrespect: the disrespectful or irreverent treatment of something others consider worthy of respect or reverence
[14th century. Via Old French from Latin sacrilegium “temple robbery,” from sacrilegus , literally “collector of sacred things,” from sacr- the stem of sacer “sacred.”]
Encarta ® World English Dictionary © & (P) 1998-2004 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
2006-11-17 05:53:20 · update #2
I was wondering the same thing too, except it was a short piano part in the middle of "Sober" that is similar to the main guitar tag in Iron Maiden's "Wasted Years".
2006-11-17 06:07:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
a lot of human beings study interior Temptation to Evanescence, in spite of the actual shown actuality that i don't think of they are that similar. yet you would :P So that is a few reliable songs to study out: - What have you ever performed - Frozen - operating Up That Hill - See Who i'm - concepts - Angels - The Howling there's a ton extra, yet those could get you all started. :) Lacuna Coil fairly reminds me of Ev., yet i do not fairly understand many of their songs. attempt closer, Our truth, Purify, and To Myself I grew to develop into. Um.....Nightwish and Evanescence? that is stretching it somewhat a techniques. they are my well-liked band in spite of the actuality that, so I hafta propose them :D - The Poet and The Pendulum - Amaranth - Eva - The Islander - want I Had An Angel - Nemo
2016-11-25 00:49:43 · answer #2 · answered by montieth 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mozart was an innovator, and very much an iconoclast for his day. I think HE would have been delighted to see someone doing something with his music that upset the status quo. Just because some of his music was written for the church (most wasn't), it doesn't mean either the music or the man was "sacred."
2006-11-17 05:54:50 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Uh.. yeah
Technically, no... but using a liberal definition of the word.. heck yes.
Evanesance sucks... therefore should not have anything to do with Mozart.
2006-11-17 05:54:32 · answer #4 · answered by RobotoMR 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, seeing as Mozart is not a god of any sort...I suppose it is fine. It isn't sacrilegious...get over it. Music can be experimental. I say good for them.
2006-11-17 05:49:04 · answer #5 · answered by tankgirl190 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Sacrilegious? Do you even know the meaning of that word?
2006-11-17 05:47:28 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
no, Mozart would have loved it, and it shows he wrote for all of the future to use
2006-11-17 05:53:22 · answer #7 · answered by michael m 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No and I don't think Mozart would have either.
2006-11-17 05:46:40 · answer #8 · answered by Rich Z 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think the band is just no good in general, sacrilegious or otherwise........ Does that answer your question???
2006-11-17 06:56:27 · answer #9 · answered by Johnny0050 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
how do you figure? what does sacriligious mean to you:? good or bad idea, it cannot be sacriligious unlless mozart just became a god...did i miss something?
2006-11-17 05:50:24 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋