you mean lower the cost of the ticket? You cant, just be glad its a minor and not something your going to go to jail for
2006-11-17 05:00:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Throw yourself on the mercy of the court and offer to go for treatment.
Don't fight it...........
That really peeves the judge/magistrate off. Our son's friend had the same charge and fought it , even though he was offered a deal. Lets say this- It wasn't pretty". The judge throw the book at him, doubled the fine , added all kinds of court costs ,probation and made sure it will be on his adult record.
But the choice is yours............Good Luck
2006-11-17 05:07:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by Akkita 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Were you guilty? Sounds like yes. Go where you are suppose to paythe fine and ask for a court date. Then plead no contest and hope that the Judge will be merciful and/or give you time to pay.
2006-11-17 05:03:15
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
in this party, no it isn't ideal. there replaced into no criminal reason through the persons to blame for printing and dispensing the yearbook. Nor replaced into there any criminal reason through every person who received the yearbook. really I doubt that maximum persons of the scholars or the college community would have observed what replaced into contained in the history of one unmarried image, if this project had not been blown up all out of percentage. (a image taken at a school dance isn't of pastime to every person who isn't both in it, or a pal or relative of someone who's contained in the image.) also, i think there's a gross massive difference between pornography and a image of two little ones making out. possibly the image will be offensive to some human beings, yet surely, I remember seeing and interpreting worse in Dolly mag even as i replaced right into a baby. (An Australian mag, aimed in course of adolescent females.) i do not understand what the precise guidelines are contained in america, yet in South Australia, the guidelines governing baby pornography are really harsh. The criminal, regardless of their age, would have their names positioned on a baby sex offenders sign in, the position they'll stay for life. This prevents them from ever operating with or close to children, and they could't stay interior 2 hundred metres of a school or baby care centre. I trust those guidelines to an quantity - sure, children could be shielded from damage as a lot as plausible. although, the regulation because it stands means that various juveniles have already been charged and their names positioned on that sign in for sexting. which means they are almost unemployable even as they depart college and would have a fabulous effect at some thing of their lives. i imagine that coaching, or in severe circumstances, being charged without being entered on the youngster sex offenders sign in, will be the further ideal reaction. i imagine that sexting is a dumb project to do, yet i don't think of it is proper that that individual could be treated interior a similar way as an adult sex criminal. ultimately, contained in terms of the yearbook, it variety of feels that the entire project has blown out of percentage. As I suggested, there replaced into no criminal reason on behalf of every person who received a yearbook - it replaced into dispensed as a memory of that different 3 hundred and sixty 5 days in college, not as an excuse to distribute baby pornography.
2016-11-25 00:43:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by cave 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
plead no contest to the charges if it your first
2006-11-17 05:02:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
agree to a stint in rehab
2006-11-17 05:01:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by lowflyer1 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
What, exactly, could you lower it to?
You do the crime, you pay the price, hon.
2006-11-17 05:29:25
·
answer #7
·
answered by Phoenix, Wise Guru 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
See a lawyer.
2006-11-17 05:00:17
·
answer #8
·
answered by jerofjungle 5
·
0⤊
1⤋