Back when O.J. was acquited I really thought he was innocent over the years I have changed my mind and now wish their was someway for him to get what he deserves. Also, even though I feel he is gulty now his lawyers at the trial did cause enough reasonable doubt for him to be acquitted
2006-11-17 04:48:56 · 19 answers · asked by Frank R 7 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
With his book coming out I feel as though he has pushed it too far. He is guilty and should be shot like a dog. Even though at the time of his trial I did think he was being framed because he was a star, not because he was Black.
2006-11-18 02:56:42 · answer #1 · answered by Georgi Girl 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He was guilty then, he's guilty now. His trial was a media circus and became a race issue. How could 12 jurors believe that all the evidence was planted to make OJ "look" guilty because he was black? Most of the cops didn't even know who OJ was when they found the bodies at Nicole's. He was a has been by that time.
2006-11-17 14:39:58 · answer #2 · answered by Debra D 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I thought there was reasonable doubt for the jury. From what we saw on TV he was guilty. But I hoped he wasn't. Now it is quite obvious he committed the murder. The Police missed the murder weapon sitting in plain view at his house. A Swiss Army knife. They were looking for a big knife with serrated edge but the Swiss army knife has that blade. They walked right by it. He is guilty but he was found not guilty. This book is a real slap in the face. One day he will get his do. Karma has a way.
2006-11-17 12:55:05 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
The only 12 people that thought The Juice was innocent were on the Jury.
2006-11-17 13:12:14 · answer #4 · answered by Adam G 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I never thought he was innocent. There was blood everywhere: on the gloves, on the rug, on the Bronco, on the dog, on Kato. If this travesty of a book is really his confession then a lot of people owe an apology to Furman and the rest of the LAPD who were accused of framing OJ.
2006-11-17 14:19:57 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I felt is was possible he did not kill Nicole, but did not feel it was likely. His then behavior made me feel he was likely guilty.
With his latest antics I have even less reasonable doubt.
The man is a sociopath. I think he did kill her.
With him writing the book and doing interviews for "If I Did It, Here's How It Happened."
He is a selfish pig and a horrible father.
What type of a father does this to his kids?
He does not seem to value that this was his children's mother.
2006-11-17 13:28:43 · answer #6 · answered by Wendy C 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I have always thought that OJ was guilty. OJ was used to being in the media/press for so long and he hasn't been for awhile. I think he wrote his book to once again get attention and be in the spotlight.
2006-11-17 13:01:27 · answer #7 · answered by nglennie_06 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I never thought he was innocent. Innocent men don't take off on a police chase, especially if they are celebrities.
2006-11-17 13:25:57 · answer #8 · answered by Jessie P 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I thougt he was guilty then and espeacially now. Can you believe him? writing a book "if he did this is how he would of done it" if ever double jeopardy could do justice now is the time. Well God will give him his day in court, he will pay one day. WHAT A SHAME!
2006-11-17 13:00:53 · answer #9 · answered by cwtammyf1@verizon.net 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I believe that O.J had some help in killing his wife. I also believe that he got away with murder because he had money and also because of the racial comments that his prosecuter made
2006-11-17 12:52:17 · answer #10 · answered by Salemn Hernandez 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋