Using conceptual physics to support religon?

Question

My beliefs are pretty much a mix of methodism/deism/quantum physics, and i believe that your perception of the world, its gods, and your ideas about the afterlife and the state of the universe will determine what you percieve as your afterlife. In quantum physics, time does not exist. Also, in order to exist, something must be observed. As time does not exist, and the perception of time is simply our minds viewing the different probabilities the world may exist in. Therefore, all people are both alive and dead. In order to observe ourselves and observe others, we must exist. As something cannot both exist and not exist, only change form or be transfered between dimensions, the sentience that inhabits our bodies must persist after death for us to observe our lives, as both life and death occur simultaniously according to this worldview.

Therefore, there must be something beyond death.

Your thoughts?

Answer 1

That's probably the most intelligent post I've seen on here yet. Thank you for restoring my faith that there IS intelligent life in the universe (even on yahoo) LOL :)

Answer 2

The universe is infinite, meaning everything that will happen has happened before, will happen again and is happening now. Our existence within this infinite universe is constant, we are always alive at some given point. Our observation of life is based on our motion through the universe relative to our ability to perceive. The point we find ourselves is based on perceptional persistence, which is, based on everything we have perceived up to this point in time where time is nothing more than perceived motion through any given set of points. (We always perceive time because we are always in motion. ) We are stuck to what we perceive our lives to be because what we have perceived up until now does not allow us to perceive anything else that is drastically different from out perceptual norm. We have been taught how to be a servant and not a god, but our mere existence and our ability to rationalize and act upon what we perceive with what equates to free will makes us our own gods

Answer 3

to quote Terry Gilliam in Monty python and the Holy Grail: "it relatively is in effortless terms a variety" :-) Quantum concept is only that; an theory. that's only a manner of describing what we seem to ascertain, and so asserting that a particle can exist in diverse states at as quickly as rather ability that we will no longer tell what its doing; like the fabled schroedingers' cat theory test, the particle / cat would desire to be the two alive and lifeless on the comparable time as we don't comprehend this is the actual state. this does not recommend that the cat rather is the two alive and lifeless; schroedinger became giving an exceptionally succinct analogy to summarise what became incorrect with the thoery he had progressed, and not attempting to make any philosophal statements! the reality is that the international is a rather extraordinary and beautiful place, and our adverse little brains are in all threat too dimensionally challenged (try imagining a 6 dimensional section area, like in thermodynamics, the muse of quantum concept) to understand how the international works. If it makes you experience greater proper approximately your existence, then have self belief that there is an afterlife, yet in my view i do no longer - for me, what i comprehend appropriate to the international does not leave a niche for "god" or another vaguely conceived theory - i think that human beings choose theory frequently, yet no longer that it neccesarily makes any distinction! i think of that the time-honored public of my fellow physicists would carry the comparable view, yet I even have heard human beings describe what they comprehend of the international from the physicist viewpoint, as info of god's life. My very own opinion? pass study (in case you haven't any longer already) Alistair M Rae's Quantum Mechanics- it's going to supply you a stable theory appropriate to the present state of wisdom. If that's too mathsy, then look at "the recent quantum universe" - i overlook the authors- and get some concepts from the persons who rather comprehend approximately quantum mechanics, and not some a million/2 baked new age theory that makes use of the bits they like from the thought, and misses the bits that don't healthful thier viewpoint.

Answer 4

The first paragraph is pretty wordy, I'm not abstract enough to really understand.

Your conclusion however is mine as well.

Answer 5

Schroedinger's Cat..............A paradox, I do believe.
So therefore..you conclude proof of afterlife erroneously

Answer 6

It is all just theory. So rationalise it any way you see fit.
If that is what you need.