2006-11-17 03:27:14 · 27 answers · asked by AmandaA 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I would give 2.5% for the poor people allover the world, not just in Africa. Make all my family, friends, close neighbours rich. Make a big party and invite anyone who live within 1 mile radius. 120 is too much...for me £10 millions is just enough!
2006-11-17 06:17:58 · answer #1 · answered by Abularaby 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
flow blow a hollow the place is the money we provide them going why ought to we save helping them how long do the west could desire to assist those African human beings why do no longer they discover ways to assist themselves can we could desire to maintain helping them unti the top of time. What concerning to the damaging uk voters in this united states of america. in case you opt for to help the African human beings then flow there and help them violeta Tony, somebody can win the lottery in uk, and what concerning to the damaging uk toddlers? that's the comparable ingredient. No it isn't the comparable ingredient we interior the west have been giving Africa billion over the 30 years considering that stay help interior the 1980's and the 2000's so which you would be able to't say that's the comparable-ingredient flow do a sprint learn. that is those Western governments and Izrael who commence chaos and conflict in non western worldwide. Who ever you get your source of suggestion from is to blame. Hollywood is run by using joo's and that they make conflict consistently blame the west they have not got any responsibly do they? movies video sport have noting to do with something muppet. who consistently asks for western help? they do whilst we are there they do no longer opt for our help STFU all your going is speaking non-experience
2016-12-30 14:03:38 · answer #2 · answered by mccasland 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ayup. I would quit working and spend the rest of my life making the future brighter for others. I don't know as I would give it to African children when there is suffering here in the US also I might start there though. You only need so much money to live on and the rest is just for show, Id rather put it to good use than buy myself more crap that I dont need.
2006-11-17 04:39:22 · answer #3 · answered by Perplexed 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No I'm afraid I wouldn't, not unless I could literally do it directly. Too much money gets creamed off by the charities these days for my liking so why should I fill their pockets anymore?
I'm more in the thinking of charity begins in the home so my friends and family and the deserving few would benefit first.
2006-11-17 03:34:17 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
after i stopped crying
spent as much as i could in a day
went on the most expensive holiday possible (hey, maybe even be a space tourist)
and built myself a house and was happy
yes, i think i would personally sponser children in poverty to ensure that they have every opportunity in life. as well as sponser small villages who need water and equipment and schools. but i wouldn't confine myself to just africa, i think i would like to spread it around a bit, and would like to ensure that their own culture is promoted in their lives, not the western culture. i would like to fund an orphanage in china. i would also consider doing the banking system for the poor that recently got recognised for the nobel peace prize.
2006-11-17 06:24:34 · answer #5 · answered by sofiarose 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would try to make the money grow to continuously fund programs that would assist the poor (food, clothing, education, etc.) and teach them to be self-sufficient. Ridding the African continent of deep-rooted corruption is essential to having them pull themselves from the depths of despair. Money cannot buy that.
2006-11-17 04:44:50 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm in the UK,Charity begins at home,If the rich nations become poor who will look after the poor nations?These so called poor nations can afford bullets but not food?
2006-11-17 06:37:12 · answer #7 · answered by Francis7 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
They asked what I do £120 million on the radio earlier today, my answer, Spend some, Save some, Waste some, so yeah, it's not like I ain't got money to spare.
2006-11-17 03:35:27 · answer #8 · answered by redfcuk 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
actually no. that isn't really that much money. i would concentrate on the poor and hungry American children. Charity begins at home after all. I would do my best to help the schools here. If i had any left i would give it to Angelina Jolie to take to Africa with her on her next "adoption" trip
2006-11-17 03:38:48 · answer #9 · answered by staci m 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Nope, but a lot of people in the UK would benefit from it. I would set up a series of trusts for HE scholarships and for children in need of urgent treatment or special equipment.
2006-11-17 06:19:23 · answer #10 · answered by LYN W 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋