After Hitler's death in 1945 Russian scientists recovered a body that was believed to be Hitler's and autopsy reports released by the USSR did indeed suggest that the body was monocular (had only one testicle, due to a genetic flaw), but there is some doubt as to whether or not the body that the Russians recovered was Hitler's as the USSR did engage in some one-upmanship with the West.
2006-11-18 06:27:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The information comes from a Soviet autopsy conducted on Hitler's remains. They noted that Hitler had only one testicle but this may have been the result of the attempted cremation. So it has never been definitively proved one way or the other.
2006-11-17 05:54:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Interesting question.
I have been reading about Hitler and WW II for many many years and have never crossed with this information. I tend to believe its a fluke.
Like the information that he was a Jew, or a homosexual, he was neither.
2006-11-17 04:08:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes and no. He had two, but one didn't drop before birth so it was still inside his body cavity. The problem is quite common, but there's now an operation to get them to descend if one has got stuck.
2006-11-17 02:26:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by pniccimiss 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
i think of the respond is confident i think of its because of the fact whilst he became struggling with in ww1 he have been given poisoned by utilising mustard gas and that i think of somebody shot it or something im specific he did coz there's a music of it and that i dont carry injury to everyone i think of hitler became in effortless terms doing what became stable in his eyes its liek muslims supply the guy of venture like x
2016-10-15 16:13:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes he was a true Monochide and contrary to popular belief his other isn't in the Albert Hall. (It rotted away years ago but you can still smell the putrid thing somewhere lol)
2006-11-17 02:32:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by tunisianboy46 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is a myth.
They have his medical records and none of them say anything like this.
As if a British music hall song of WWII is a reliable source!
2006-11-18 23:17:47
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
YES!!That's why he did what he did....to feel like a complete man. To make up for where/what he lacked.....Can you imagine if he had both of his testicles, it would off changed history as you know it....it's true!
2006-11-17 03:52:31
·
answer #8
·
answered by vee 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
that's the word on the street. Ol' one-nut sure did a lot of damage with just one good testy
2006-11-17 03:02:26
·
answer #9
·
answered by Super G 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
No the song is entirely inaccurate dint believe everything you hear. If I said you had one testical would you believe me? Theres your answer.
2006-11-17 02:27:17
·
answer #10
·
answered by David Todd 1
·
0⤊
1⤋