2006-11-17 01:45:35 · 9 answers · asked by Raycious 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
He did a great job in Munich, so I have faith he'll be able to pull of a womanizing secret agent to a tee.
2006-11-17 03:44:06 · answer #1 · answered by I Am Legend 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think It was a very good movie, they changed it up a bit. Bond is more of a darker character, and also there was not the gadgets and car chases like in previous films. The reason I think they did this is because of the previous film, the previous movie was one of the best as far as special effects and car chases go. Which made the people that watch the Bond films have higher expectations for the next film (Casino Royale) so film makers had to change it up a bit so that the film was not what they expected. The other thing different about the new movie is, it is more of a physiological film, like in the part where they have the poker game, he is trying to figure out if he is bluffing or not. To wrap is all up. It was a very good film, they threw us a curve ball and we took a hit in the face, knowing this with out seeing it probably makes you think it is not as good as previous films, but you do have to see it. So 1 - 10 rating it gets a 10. Hope you all like it.
2006-11-17 14:44:46 · answer #2 · answered by parkerpjd 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He has a pleasant face, but does NOT look like a "Bond", IMO. He would do better as a thug in some period drama or maybe a sequel to "The Full Monty" or a sidekick to DeNiro. He's thoroughly "British-looking" (to me), but has none of the sauve, handsome (elite-type) look of someone like Connery or Timothy Dalton.
For the record: I couldn't STAND Pierce Brosnan (too prissy), nor Roger Moore (same reason). I forget the other guy...he was...forgettable!
If Ray Liotta could learn a British accent...that'd be a real Bond-type!
2006-11-17 01:59:47 · answer #3 · answered by Gwynneth Of Olwen 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Just saw this film, and I absolutely loved every second of it! Daniel Craig IS James Bond. And yes he was not exactly "suave" but he brought an edge and roughness to Bond that I just found. . .sexy. Aside from the looks, Craig truly proved himself more than able to step up to the plate. He's hit a home run.. . .and I applaud his wonderful work.
2006-11-17 07:18:09 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
from what I have seen with the trailers & I have watched them
it looks to be a awesome movie just saw a lot of great reviews from newspapers giving it 4 or 5 stars..
Daniel Craig will make this film & he will be accepted as the new James Bond........ oh & I am going this weekend to see it..
2006-11-17 05:24:36 · answer #5 · answered by muffett1 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
For a prequel Bond, he looks the part perfectly. Also, he can't be worse than Brosnan or Dalton (even though he's got many fans). I saw him in Layer Cake and he was really good in that, so I've got high hopes.
2006-11-17 02:32:33 · answer #6 · answered by Masta Batang Dollar Billz 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
he's like the books describe him and actually i don't think he's as cold a killer as he should be. He is more of a mix between the movies and the books.
2006-11-17 02:07:58 · answer #7 · answered by Ducks 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
pretty arrogant as the role demands, but i haven't seen the movie yet so i don't have the full picture so to speak...
2006-11-17 02:00:46 · answer #8 · answered by mar 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I like him
2006-11-17 01:53:22 · answer #9 · answered by Greg S 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋