Do developed countries contribute more than less developed countries in science and technology?

Question

i need real points and answers.
i need a yes and a no answer and please explain.

Answer 1

This is a well thought of question which can be debated on.see,,every country
consists of specialists and generalists.(i hope the terms are explanatory in itself).Only through the broad-perspective minded
generalists, service is rendered to the sp making their innovation and creative ability's stand out..
As in the developed countries,the proportion is balanced compared to the developing countries.The gen' in the so called de' count' venture out exploiting every specialist not only in his country but throughout the world.Now its clear why the dev' coun'
stand high..
coming down to your question,its obvious who contributes more reasoned out in the above statements.

Answer 2

Obviously! An example of being developed is contribution to science at technology. The US and Europe have given the world many things, like computers

Just look at countries and ask what they have contributed. Sudan has given nothing. The Saudis happened to be sitting on oil, a substance they didn't know what to do with, or how to get it out of the ground in the first place.

Besides Japan (which gave us the transistor radio among other things), most Asian countries have contributed little towards tecnology, but instead could make others people's inventions cheaper.

Answer 3

YES- Developed countries, like the USA, UK, and Russia, have 100's of universities, funded from federal coffers, doing research on many social, medical, and engineering problems for the betterment of their own societies. In addition, the developed world, with its economy based on capitalism, has many inventors and developers bringing more ideas to the market, i.e. the people. Even more so, these countries have huge military budgets. Much development is directly related to defense and much more attention is focused on bringing commercial applications to these technologies.
These enterprises have developed: digital watches, microchips, cell phones, satellite TV, GPDS, the Internet, ultra sound.

AND
No Developed countries rob the undeveloped world of their resources and ideas. While its easy to trace the developed world's taking of the world's resources, stealing its technologies is less noticed.
One example is Botox. This plastic surgery treatment was originally discovered in Haiti, as the 'zombie' drug used by Voo Doo practitioners. Most of the basic science and applications of mankind's technologies are in use by people in undeveloped areas, their own survival is at stake, inventing is their tool. Developed countries, which are just better at the manufacturing and marketing, steal these ideas and reintroduce to make money

Answer 4

No
Developed countries are actually contributing less to the development of science and technology.
Development in science and techno are not related to whether a country is developed or not but to how many geniuses there are in the country.

Answer 5

yes definetly!! im saying this because developing countries are still in the process of inventing & discovering whereas developed countries are way ahead and can think in wider perspectives as they already have the equipments and machinery available to them.

Answer 6

ok reliable to date, yet you may desire to do better readings. CDC---------------------- an theory CDC aims "straightforward yet differenciated" demands various aims for international locations in accordance to their point of progression. bear in mind the China we negociated the Kyoto Protocol with had a GDP ppp in keeping with capita of 500 USD !!! It wasn´t the business skill it fairly is now. So in accordance to CDC, international locations could be separated in 3 communities: -> developped (GDP over 20,000 USD): objective to cut back emissions -> rising: objective to stabilize emissions jointly as pursuing the form.. reliable improve of GDP/emissions Emission alleviation value could be shared between the international industry (more suitable international locations) and the rising united states of america (e.G. China will now have the no longer costly capability to act... and that they do) - > arising international locations: progression on a greener scheme by using carbon finance. as quickly as a rustic reaches the subsequent point, it may could desire to take a more suitable committment intensity objective----------SECTORAL aims Heavy industries could nicely be taken out of the Kyoto Protocol and get an own intensity objective assigned. that is often quantity of CO2 in keeping with ton of aluminum, steel or cement. that isn't any difficulty as a results of fact the technologies is largely shared international and the sectors are controlled by using a small style of employer businesses that are waiting and keen to act. This takes out partly the difficulty of the burden sharing between international locations ! No new plant must be allowed whether it is not on the final available Technoogy.