Neither ! The Rooster Came First, and the Poor Hen just Rolled over and went to Sleep!!<*>L<*>O<*>L<*>!!
2006-11-16 21:58:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by gvaporcarb 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
The chicken, of course.
After extensive research by the most prominent scientific minds of our time, using the latest aids in computing and laboratory equipment including scanning electron microscopes, it is now a well established fact that eggs would come second in a race with chicken due to their (the egg's) apparent lack of locomotion, i.e legs, wings etc.
So, I hope this is the last time I see this question!
2006-11-21 05:32:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by I Drum 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The chicken or the egg is a reference to the causality dilemma which arises from the expression "which came first, the chicken or the egg?". Since both the chicken and the egg create the other in certain circumstances (a chicken emerges from an egg; an egg is laid by a chicken) it is ambiguous which originally gave rise to the other. Purely logical attempts to resolve the dilemma result in an infinite regress, since an egg was caused by a chicken, which was caused by an egg, etc. Since every chicken originates from its egg, it seems obvious the egg came first. Put simply, the reason is down to the fact that genetic material does not change during an animal's life. The solution may require an examination of syntax and may rely on verification from advances in modern genetic science. When used in reference to difficult problems of causality, the chicken and egg dilemma is often used to appeal to the futility of debate and lay it to rest.
THE HISTORY
he earliest reference to the dilemma is found in Plutarch's Moralia, in the books titled "Table Talk," in a series of arguments based on questions posed in a symposium. Under the section entitled, "Whether the hen or the egg came first," the discussion is introduced in such a way as to suggest that the origin of the dilemma was even older:
"...the problem about the egg and the hen, which of them came first, was dragged into our talk, a difficult problem which gives investigators much trouble. And Sulla my comrade said that with a small problem, as with a tool, we were rocking loose a great and heavy one, that of the creation of the world..."
Various answers have been formulated in response to the question, many of them humorous.
As suggested by the alternative definitions and solutions given below, the chicken-or-egg dilemma has multiple semantic variants and can thus be viewed as an exercise in semantics. Regarding at least two of these variants, the field of biology contains decisive contextual information. Although the problem has been around in one form or another for millennia, making it difficult or impossible to know who first "solved" it, the biological information needed to resolve all of the obvious semantic variants has only been available for decades.
A modern analysis covering all of the major variants was authored by Christopher Langan, published in 2001 on the Mega Foundation website[1], and subsequently included in his book of essays, The Art of Knowing [1]. It appeared again in The Improper Hamptonian [2], was included in abbreviated form in a 2001 Long Island Newsday Q&A column featuring Langan [3], and was compactly summarized in Langan's 2001 Popular Science interview.
A CNN article on May 26, 2006 featured an analysis, according to which the egg came first [2]. The key criteria on which CNN bases its answer, involving relatively recent findings from reproductive and evolutionary biology, are identical to several of those cited in the prior analysis.
2006-11-17 12:13:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by sunil j 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
The egg. The first chicken hatched from that egg. The first chicken's mother was a evolutionary pre-chicken.
2006-11-17 10:34:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'd say the chicken, because without the chicken, the egg can't hatch!
And moron, in your dish if the egg is on top, the chicken then came first, seen as you have to put the chicken at the bottom first.
2006-11-17 08:44:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by poepies 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
It's so obvious that the egg is first. I'll explain.
In a plate of chicken biryani, the egg is on top. And the chicken is buried at the bottom. That solves this age old question.
2006-11-17 06:09:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by moron 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Christopher Columbus
2006-11-17 05:55:57
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
the chicken of course the reason-Adam and eve were adults a chicken is an adult.an egg is like a baby and of course Adam and Eve were not babies.
2006-11-17 05:55:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by Triple H 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
The egg.
The first chicken egg was a mutation laid by a proto-chicken.
2006-11-17 10:13:47
·
answer #9
·
answered by sudonym x 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
I found out the answer to this question at bible study one night...The chicken came first....because God created the birds before they could mate...just as he created man before he could mate....I'm not sure of the exact place in genisis I found it but It's in there....something about flocks...
2006-11-17 11:43:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by Constance L 2
·
0⤊
0⤋