nope
2+3(x-4) < 3(2x-5)
2+3x-12 < 6x-15
3x-10 < 6x-15
-3x < -5
x < 5/3
2006-11-16 20:02:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Not unless the 2+3 is actually a factor (2+3), if not it should be,
2 + 3(x-4) < 3(2x - 5)
3x -10 < 6x -15
substracting 3x from both sides,
-10 < 3x -15
=> 3x > 5
then,
x > 5/3
2006-11-17 10:18:25
·
answer #2
·
answered by yasiru89 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. this is not correct.The correct steps are as following
2+3(x - 4) < 3(2x - 5)
2+3x-12 < 3(2x - 5)
3x - 10 < 6x - 15
3x -6x < -15+10
-3x < -5
3x > 5 (When you multiply both sides of an inequality wuth -1, change the sign of inequality.)
x > (5/3) (this is final answer)
I hope this helpes you. All the best.
2006-11-17 04:22:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by Paritosh Vasava 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Wrong.
In a mathematic operation, one should peform the multiplication and division first before performing the addition and subtraction.
Hence, the inequality should be:
2 + 3(x-4) < 3(2x-5)
2 + 3x - 12 < 6x -15
3x -10 < 6x -15
15 - 10 < 6x - 3x
5 < 3x
x > 5/3
2006-11-17 04:05:12
·
answer #4
·
answered by orhhai 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No
2+3x-12<6x-15
3x-10<6x-15
3x-6x<-15+10
-3x<-5
x<5/3
2006-11-17 04:05:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by Princess 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
2 + 3x - 12 < 6x -15
3x -10 < 6x -15
-3x < -5
x < 5/3
2006-11-17 04:04:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
no, it's incorrect. here's the correct answer:
2+3x-12 < 6x-15
3x-10 < 6x-15
5<3x or 3x>5
in the first step, 2+3(x-4), only the 3 gets distributed to the (x-4). once you distribute, THEN you put the 2 in front, ending up with 2+3x-12.
2006-11-17 03:59:40
·
answer #7
·
answered by christina rose 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
No.
2 + 3x - 12 < 6x - 15
3x - 10 < 6x - 15
3x < 6x - 5
-3X < -5
3x < 5
x < 5/3
I think. I'm positive your answer is wrong. But I'm not sure if I'm right. Sorry!
2006-11-17 04:01:38
·
answer #8
·
answered by ThatLady 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
2+3(x-4) < 3(2x-5)
2+3x-12 < 6x-15
-3x < -1
x > 1/3
I hope you can correct it
2006-11-17 04:04:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by MetZ 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
no.
you must distribute the 3 first as opposed to adding the 2.
2006-11-17 03:56:41
·
answer #10
·
answered by James L 1
·
0⤊
0⤋