Is censorship a violation of freedom of speech?

Question

First my understanding: We are granted "freedom of speech" in the Constitution. However, I know that there should be a proper way of acting in public. There should be guidance for children when they are exposed to things that may seem inappropriate, such as nude sculptures in a museum or certain television show material. However, as adults, do we need other people to tell us what we can or cannot say in public? Sure, it looks bad when someone is speaking like a sailor, but then again, a sailor speaks like that because that's how a sailor speaks. If I wanted to use 'colorful' language on this forum, and if it offends anyone, why should it be blanked out and my original thought edited? Can't the other person choose to not read my comment and move on? I think that Americans, and it's mainly old Americans, are too uptight that they want to turn back the clock to a time when supposedly nobody cursed or exposed nudity. Can't people just grow up and accept other's thoughts?

Answer 1

Government censorship is a constitutional violation. The protections in the constitution only apply to govt (not private) action.

If you're talking about Yahoo, that's a private forum. And private forums are subject to whatever internal rules and policies they choose to adopt. Yahoo has guidelines that you argee to follow as a condition of using this private service.

I agree with your core concept -- people need to stop being so irrationally sensitive, and allow broad discussions. I don't agree with personal attacks, because they are largely pointless, but rarely is a general comment actually going to be a personal attack.

That being said, again this is a private forum, with established rules.

Answer 2

It relies upon on no matter if the censorship is constrained to e book or televising of obscene or prurient textile or count number which could compromise the protection of the rustic or some juicy products which could reason embarrassment to the institution.contained in the first party,that is argued that the impressionable minds of faculty little ones and faculty going kids might want to get diverted to the sleazier factors of existence if there have been no censorship.besides the undeniable fact that the argument cuts any opposite direction too because that is a truth of existence that in on the prompt's international,even college little ones are ok versed in sexual concerns.hence in such concerns any proscription or censorship may have the completed opposite effect in that the inquisitive and curious minds of the youngsters might want to grow to be imaginative sufficient to locate procedures and technique of defeating the ban.the answer for that is to go away it to the media to exercising life like restraint to confirm that blatant indecency is prevented.As regards publishing or exhibiting concerns which could compromise the nationwide protection,the ban might want to be justified.There must be no interference in different concerns because the aggrieved persons honestly can hotel to legal treatments which are available in. contained in the most suitable prognosis,there are parts the position self-regulation must be utilized and in concerns of nationwide interest censorship may nicely be warranted.

Answer 3

true. only a court can decide if freedom of speech was violated not individuals citizens unless your in their "house". most older Americans remember when people tryed to at least show respect for others. Even others with bad habits, But the PC crowd has forced many issue's down the throats of Americans. there was probably gays in the military during the civil war, but when did it become an issue? when the PC crowed got offended because a gay in the military was called a bad name. see what the PC crowd has caused? they are so enlightened ain't they?

Answer 4

Censorship is important to keep out the nasties out there. Unfortunately, censorship is being abused by the radical Christian right(burning Harry Potter books...damn nazi's), governments using censorship for their own self preservation and such.

Freedom is important. It is worth fighting for, including the act of making war with one's own government if necessary.

Answer 5

To a large extent the answer in subjective. However in my own opinion "censorship" is a violation of freedom of speech.