Isn't it the time to rewrite our constitution?

Question

Our constitution and religious books (gita, quran, bible etc) were
written prior to the invention of ICT
(information and communication technologies) and other scientific technologies.

Isn't this is the right time to review and rewrite them.

1. To create a win-win world
2. "Balance" the social, economic, and cultural injustices in our societies
3. Defines a "roadmap" for our future generations

Answer 1

It sounds like a good idea. Here's the problem.

Unlike at the time of formation, we as a nation are very polarized. There is a huge mass of people, often in the majority, that think it's acceptable to force majority religions on the minority, ok for the government to ignore the laws at will, and ok to discriminate against couples based on their gender.

The current constitution may be flawed, but given the level of hate and partisan brain-damage currently rampant in the US, it's scary to think of what else they might come up with.

Answer 2

The politicians hate the structure and especially the second one, fourth, and 10th amendments. The structure of the USA of u.s. is built to reduce the potential of the federal authorities yet that very set of politicos has been ignoring that structure in view that 1861. The politicians lust after potential honestly else and the structure stands as a barricade of their course to most suitable rule. they'll say and do **something** to receive/protect that potential. the united statesA. is a republic. We vote if you're meant to *represent* us, yet that representation takes position purely even as that is going to take care of a vote. the issue is honestly not the politicians, besides the undeniable fact that they have got lengthy gone to tremendous lengths to enable and extra their device of flappers and kickbacks, that is the device. shall we be a lot more effective off if shall we get rid of the politicians from their offices and get rid of the workplace, yet people are literally not waiting to regulate themselves so we are stuck with our elected royalty. We *do* favor to regulate the names although. The extremely-wealthy politicians haven't any take care of how their parts stay. The politicos imagine that $30,000/three hundred and sixty 5 days is "wealthy" yet a number of them are well worth that a lot on a daily foundation. like the French royalty of the 18th century, the wealthy politicians favor purely their personal convenience. "What? the individuals haven't any bread to eat? then enable them eat cake!" The politicians have come to trust that they are our masters fairly than our servants. The ruling type makes the guidelines and is not concern to its personal guidelines. they're out of control. It' s time to vote all of them out of workplace. we favor to have a 'get rid of INCUMBENT' option on the poll.

Answer 3

Flawed but good.

Re-writing would also be ripe with blood, murder, all out anarchy - very dangerous people willing to kill you off if you did not support them, their war's etc...

If anything I would only amend the constitution, or rework the 14th to leave out corporations having equal worth as individual persons.

Answer 4

The Constitution should be rewritten to define treason as any attempt to obstruct the nation's efforts to win this or any future war.

Answer 5

The constitution and bible have been rewritten.

Just try to rewrite the koran! You won't live long.

Answer 6

i believe we're due for a new constitution, yes, but we would need many political geniuses to help create it so our country doesnt get screwed over

Answer 7

Really to what? It is as relevant today as it was then.

Answer 8

it's long overdue in my opinion.