that's the plan with education... break it down, say it has to be privatized to work...
then you get a fantastic system like the current health care system where only hundreds of thousands won't recieve an education... and those will basically become the slave laborers... low, low pay for maximized profit... basically an end to the middle class...
of course, that will set up the prime ingredients for a revolution...
2006-11-16 17:36:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Yes I can lay it on Clinton and his administration. Liberals have had a strangle hold on education policies for decades. You want education improved? Make the job of teacher competitive by vouchers. Allow the students to go where they choose to go to school and stop policies like not grading the students' work based on their performance. They have to prove they have accomplished the education they've been assigned before they can move on. Half the cost of higher education could be trimmed off if the colleges didn't have to teach their incoming students basic education MISSED in general education because of liberals' policies.
NO BUDGET HAS BEEN CUT. Spending growth is all that has been cut. Your basic premise is based on a lie.
Socialized health care dessimates the health care system. Sure, every citizen is covered in Canada IF THEY CAN GET IN BEFORE THEY DIE!!!!! The waiting list for an appointment is 6 months to a year!!!!!!!! That's way better than the U.S. right? Grow up. Learn the facts. You're the one who's ignorant.
2006-11-16 17:45:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
For one your premise is false Americas higher education is the finest in the world bar none. It is the public schools that are the problem. From your statement I must conclude that you think money is the issue. It is not. if u look at statistics from charter schools and private schools both religious and non religious things look much better. What is interesting is that for the most part these schools are doing it with less dollars per a student than public schools. What does distinguish these schools from public schools is that by their nature they have greater parental involvement. As a matter of fact some charter schools actually require active parental involvement. Gee what a concept holding parents teachers and the students themselves responsible for a child's education. But to you the government is responsible in this case the republican govt of the last 6 yrs. The truth of the matter is that government wastes more than it spends even programs like in Medicare and Medicaid which have done great good less than 50 cents on the dollar spent actually goes directly to the specified recipient the rest is spent on administration and bureaucracy. Alas, it is quite clear you have a closed mind on the subject. In your world the government should educate your child provide for the health and welfare of your child and ensure that he has a comfortable wage to live on when he is an adult. I point out that in your world there is really no need for a parent at all why not give the children to the government at berth and eliminate the need for parenting at all and eliminate this unnecessary intermediary.. In your world the government is responsible for the fact that Bill Gates makes more than you
In my world however I take personally responsible for my actions and teach my children the same. In my world the actions of bringing life into the world brings with it the responsibility to provide for the care and health of that child. In my world as a parent I provide encouragement mentoring on the lessons I have learned in life to to ensure my child has the tools to be a success in life himself.. In my world I hold my self primarily accountable more than any person or entity in the ultimate outcome of bringing a life into this world.
Sadly that is only in my world and all to many people do not live in my world in American society.
2006-11-16 19:31:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by sooj 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
yea, your so right its the republicans fault we cant FAIL someone. Its the republicans fault we have to use a pretty purple color on wrong work so we dont "make them feel bad". Its the republicans fault the family wont play a larger role in making sure their children understand the idea of responsibility and owning up to your actions. I know of very few conservatives that think coddeling them is the right way to handle it. What is the difference between back when our systems were the best and now? How about making kids take responsibility? Throwing hard earned tax dollars at it doesnt solve the problem. I know thats hard to understand though.
2006-11-16 18:01:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by CaptainObvious 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hey brainchild.
Bill Clinton was the Governor of Arkansas for 12 years and where did Arkansas rank nation wide as far as education went during his tenure? Was it 47th or 48th?
But then again he only had 8 years to do for the country what took him 12 years to do for Arkansas.
Put that in your crack pipe and smoke it!
2006-11-16 17:55:03
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
the 1st modification says that the government won't be able to establish a faith, and maximum state constitutions assure freedom of religion. That has been interpreted to intend the government won't be able to make your suggestions up on one faith over yet another, or tutor selection. no longer all Christians have faith an identical component -- Catholics have a reasonably distinctive 10 commandments, as an occasion, and a great form of denominations (like Episcopalians) have not have been given any project with gays. Mary's function is distinctive in accordance to the denomination. no longer each faith is anti-abortion. some have faith in an lively god, some in a god who created the international and enable it improve. some have faith the Christian Bible is rather actual, some produce different holy books. Catholics settle for evolution, evangelicals do no longer. No formal prayers in college ability the form is working for all religions. the U. S. President isn't all-helpful, whoever he's. Congress gadgets spending, the president would not. the U. S. won't improve right into a socialist united states of america except Congress makes it so and the terrific court docket and the President agree. it particularly is fantastically no longer likely. "Obamacare" isn't socialist or communist -- it grew to become into actual conceived via Republicans in answer to Clinton's proposed wellbeing reform plan. a similar plan began in Massachusetts below Republican Governor Mitt Romney. (I wager your instructor would not have faith Romney is a Christian.) As for a number of the different factors -- a million) Why DO Canadians call their land of their baby's names? that's a clean one on me. mothers and dads in the U. S. do it to evade sources taxes. Is Canada distinctive? 2)the government won't be able to stroll in and take over a employer. What handed off with the automobile agencies and the financial agencies is the government made deals with them. In return for bailing them out, the agencies agreed to show situations. (inventory, loans, replace in administration.) the agencies could have refused and long gone out of employer. Many very non secular people have faith that Jesus will return after a era of great turmoil. looks like your instructor thinks we are in that element of turmoil ordinary by way of fact the top cases. people in the lifeless of night a while thought they have been in the top cases, too. 1000 years later, right here we are.
2016-10-22 05:53:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, but we can blame it on the advent of Liberalism in the schools during the late 60's and early 70's. We are just starting to feel the effects of all that.
2006-11-16 17:55:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Who can touch the education system with the liberal Teachers Union who contributes 99% democrat, <1% conservative
This is the stoopidest question I have ever heard in my life.
I award you no points and may God have mercy on your soul!!!!
2006-11-16 19:10:52
·
answer #8
·
answered by Stonerscientist 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
The education system is almost entirely made up of Liberals, That should answer your question. Idiots teaching the young.,
2006-11-16 18:14:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by mark g 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
The education budget has INCREASED over the last 6 years. Please try to get a fact right every once in a while.
2006-11-16 17:53:04
·
answer #10
·
answered by yupchagee 7
·
2⤊
1⤋