Hey why does everyone jump all over Vincent K McMahon everytime TNA is looking for some cheap publicity?
So they can't cut the mustard,maybe they need to incorporate all 3 brands cos WWE & ECW will surely rule,then again you have to have somewhere for the washed up hacks to wrestle I suppose...ie TNA.....
2006-11-16 17:18:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by Whoops 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
In time it might. McMahon has a terrible reputation as to treating wrestlers like garbage (he still doesn't pay for their health benefits), and there isn't a question that he's shortened the lives of many of the stars;
Guerrero, Rude, British Bulldog, making owen hart do that dumb stunt with only one cable and no back up. Several dozen wrestlers have died in their 30's and 40's over the years and it's not from natural causes. It's from heart failure due to the drugs and pain killers they have to take so they won't miss time. McMahon hates when people take time off; the latest is Kurt Angle.
Angle, Keibler, Stratus, The Rock, Austin, Jericho, were all burned out by McMahons' scheduling. They rarely get any time off.
McMahon says they aren't tough enough if they need time off yet that ***** takes 6 weeks off along with his son after they get their butts kicked at the last pay per view for Raw. McMahon is a lowlife.
I just hope they don't have stupid teenage story lines like WWE. WWE rarely wrestles (they avg. only 23 minutes of wrestling for every 2:05 hours of RAW, and it's old.
I think TNA is far better. The wrestling is awesome and they are great characters. They need some work but I like them better already. To actually see wrestling is new.
2006-11-16 18:16:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by Ice4444 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
i've got watched WWE programming on the grounds that i turn into 5, and that i ought to declare that it is not as stable because it was once. final time it turn into thrilling turn into 2003. This year could desire to be their worst year. the undertaking is that no person lasts long anymore, they're making stupid judgements(Batista's under no circumstances ending identify pictures, Khali winning the WHC, Cena's long identify reign, etc. Cena being injured could be a stable element for WWE.), ECW is a glittered version of velocity/warmth, and that they've a shame of a women's branch. I kinda omit the techniques-set era, yet wrestling isn't as regularly occurring because it was once.
2016-12-29 03:32:02
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
If there was a war,WWE will surely win.Vince is 100x smarter than those dumbasses running TNA combined.WWE is a multi-billionaire company,TNA is gonna be bought out by WWE.
2006-11-16 20:07:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by WWE Champ 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
well i hope so...once i saw them call out DX i had goosebumps. this is going to get crazy.
DX will own VKM.
VKM sux. F U to all those ppl who chanted DX sux on TNA. WWE will always be dominant. but hey, Samoa joe and Aj are friggin incredible.
2006-11-16 17:09:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by sinisterminister 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I hope WWE loses because it's old, boring and stale.
2006-11-16 18:17:42
·
answer #6
·
answered by Cyrax 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
maybe if they do have a war wwe will win because VINCE is GOD
2006-11-16 17:06:38
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
maybe
2006-11-16 23:11:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by Bling Bling 5
·
0⤊
0⤋