English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Yeah he got off, but the Civil case said he did it?

Do you think he did it or was it a racist police department that set him up?

2006-11-16 15:50:11 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events Other - News & Events

15 answers

yes. his rare blood type should have hung him on the spot. shows where alot of money can get ya, acquited of murder.

2006-11-18 00:57:26 · answer #1 · answered by dianed33 5 · 2 0

I watched much of the trial on TV, I believe it was quite clear that the police made serious errors in their investigation which certainly did not help those on the jury to lean towards guilty. I tend to think he did it, his behavior right after the murder in a number of instances were just too odd. That does not mean I would have voted guilty had I been on the jury. I hope you don't buy his book.

2006-11-17 00:07:54 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

of course he did it. all the evidence points directly at him. there was no physical evidence of anyone but oj at the scene. johnny cochran whipped out the race card to draw attention away from the evidence against oj.

plus, use your common sense. oj was called in for questioning and didn't show up. then he led police on a slow pursuit for several miles with a pistol in his mouth threatening to kill himself after he already wrote a suicide note to his mother. does that sound like the actions of an innocent man?

2006-11-17 05:45:56 · answer #3 · answered by locksmithite 5 · 2 0

I don't think he did it. The civil case only has to prove if he most likely did it. Circumstantial evidence is all that is needed. It has nothing to do with the truth. You mean to tell me that the whole world believes he did it & the only people who didn't believe it just happened to be on the jury together????? All the evidence that the public knew about wasn't there for the jury to decide on. I believe when you have racists cops, you can never believe what the say 100% (reasonable doubt).

2006-11-17 00:13:28 · answer #4 · answered by ttjakt 6 · 0 4

Yes he did it. He had the finest criminal lawyers who convinced the court that he was being framed by a racist police.

2006-11-17 03:20:39 · answer #5 · answered by HM 3 · 2 0

Wonder if he will put in his book how many hours of hard sweat, blood, and tears he put into "looking for the real murderers" as he said he was going to do. Maybe he thinks they could be golfers????

2006-11-17 02:04:24 · answer #6 · answered by marsha 3 · 2 1

Read his new book , brains too , it puts it in perspective.

2006-11-16 23:58:13 · answer #7 · answered by metcalfmaintenance1 5 · 1 1

with out a doublt, ya he is a killer

2006-11-17 10:19:37 · answer #8 · answered by Kenshin 5 · 2 0

Tupac is to blame for this.

2006-11-16 23:51:33 · answer #9 · answered by donatellos_green_turtle_ass 1 · 2 1

He did it. I like your name. ;-)

2006-11-16 23:54:42 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers