English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Before you say son they don't, yes they do, I am a waitress at a diner in a college town and one of my customer whom is from Iraq told me that the USA pays him $50,000.00/year to go to college here and learn about oil. He also said that they offered him $250,000.00 to become as US citizen, now why do we do this?

2006-11-16 15:28:34 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

11 answers

Iraq is very rich in Oil my son and I believe you. This called "investment"! tomorrow these students would be "Ministers" in Iraq and would "CLOSE THEIR EYES" and sign "BILLIONS DOLLARS" contract with US companies to buy 'Weapons' and AGAIN have a big war with Iran and others!

In IRAN we have seen a lot of these kinds of Ministers. Khomeini execute many of them! That is the reasons that US is anger with IRAN as in last 25 years did not get any CONTRACT from Iran!

List of Corrupt Judges and Lawyers involved in my actions
http://www.geocities.com/doworkout/judgtable.html

List of corrupt Police Officers in Toronto & montreal
http://www.geocities.com/doworkout/pig.html

Canadians' Crimes
http://www.geocities.com/doworkout/canada1.html

List of corrupt judges and lawyers in Canada
http://www.geocities.com/doworkout/1dictionary.html

Corruption in Justice System in Canada
http://www.geocities.com/doworkout/80dictionary.html

LAWSUIT v. Canadian Judges and Lawyers
http://www.geocities.com/doworkout/conflict.html

INDEX
http://www.geocities.com/doworkout

TORTURE IN CANADA
http://www.geocities.com/doworkout/section11.html

2006-11-16 15:40:17 · answer #1 · answered by Iranian Amigo 3 · 0 1

The WMD argument became fairly in undemanding terms an excuse the Bush administration believed the yank human beings could desire to settle for as a valid explanation for going to conflict in Iraq. factor of the respond could have had some ingredient to do with unfinished business enterprise business enterprise of the previous President Bush. yet there's a nil.33 hazard, which no you are able to ever be arranged to talk. My concept is that this: some 3 hundred and sixty 5 days earlier the beginning up of the 2d conflict in Iraq, the two Colin Powel and President Bush have been given here out publicly in opt for or a loose Palistinian state. This rankled the Israelis to no end, and Ariel Sharon counseled Bush that if the two one in all them saved speaking some loose Palestinian state then he (Israel) could desire to kill each and every very final between the Palestinians and end the precedence as right now as and for all. at recent Bush and Powel dropped the venture of a loose Palestinian state and you never heard yet yet another peep approximately it for over a 300 and sixty 5 days. Ariel Sharon made yet yet another call for on the comparable time; that throughout the time of the process replace for allowing the Palestinians to stay, the U. S. could desire to could desire to bypass in and end the Iraqi hazard to Israel. So under rigidity from the Israelis, who mandatory to end a minimum of one secure practices hazard, the U. S. became forced to invade Iraq and end the SCUD missile hazard to Israel. Had the U. S. now no longer carried out that, then it may desire to have been complicated-pressed to describe to the yank human beings why it became status by using ability of and allowing mass-execution of the Palestinians by using ability of the Israelis. (The Jewish lobby interior the U. S. does now no longer have allowed the administration or Congress to return out against the strikes of the Israelis. the U. S. is hamstrung jointly because it incorporates taking everywhere against the Jewish state.) this could be an theory that is denied by using ability of all and numerous yet makes better journey than believing that the Iraqis had ANY weapon which could be a hazard to the U. S.. A hazard to Israel, honestly... yet to the U. S.? No way.

2016-12-30 13:50:16 · answer #2 · answered by Erika 3 · 0 0

When the US invaded Iraq most if not all of their oil workers either left Iraq for good or were killed. Even today the few that stayed in Iraq are targeted by terrorists as prime victims. So your customer is getting paid so much by the US Govt. because:

1) They desperately need Iraqis to run the Iraq oil industry.
2) They need to practically bribe them to do it because they are prime targets of terrorists in Iraq.
3) No Iraqi oil revenue means US taxpayers have to shell out even more billions to pay for the war.

2006-11-16 15:39:49 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It's probably some kind of scholarship, or maybe he is very smart, or his parents got killed in the war.
Did he say everyone from Iraq got this?
It does bother me too, how they take care of people from other countries, before they take care of us; assumining we are all rich, witch we are not, it doesn't make sense to me.
About thirty years ago, we needed more people so they tried getting immigrants into our schools systems, now there are more than enough and we don't need more.
I wish they would just give us a break, we have more than enough immigrants here now.

2006-11-16 15:39:21 · answer #4 · answered by pixles 5 · 0 0

united states should take care of it's people the citizens AMERICANS! not some immigrant or immigrants that don't give a s@#t about are country and are people! get them the f#$k out! deport them all or kill'em!

2006-11-16 15:49:32 · answer #5 · answered by tingler 2 · 1 0

That's are government..They like to make sure were footing the bill for everyone EXCEPT us citizens!

2006-11-16 15:38:02 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

People can say anything they want, doesn't make it true. Ask to see proof of such payment before you believe it.

2006-11-16 15:43:39 · answer #7 · answered by Fred C 7 · 0 0

so when he goes back to iraq he can tell everybody what were really like

2006-11-16 15:33:52 · answer #8 · answered by Josh 2 · 0 0

They are probably grooming him to go back and support their policies....

2006-11-16 16:05:15 · answer #9 · answered by deevoonay 3 · 0 0

Somewhere along the line you can thank a liberal.

2006-11-16 15:33:57 · answer #10 · answered by ? 4 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers