Freedom Of The Press: Point of View on Freedom of the press involving celebrities.?

Question

Does the public reserve the right to know the truth, does the individual have the right to mantain a private life.

Are there any other ideas that may pertain to freedom of the press??

Answer 1

Current law in the US is that people can comment about celebrities, as long as what they say is not factually false. And if it is false, the person speaking is still protected as long as they did not (or could not reasonably) know that it was false.

So, celebrities -- called public figures, and includes politicians as well as media stars -- have lesser privacy, primarily because they have chosen to present themselves in the public spotlight.

This is US law. Other countries may vary.

Answer 2

The public does not have the right to know all the truth. They do not have the right to know how many times in the day I go to the bathroom, etc. Neither do they have the right to know if I snore. It's none of their business. It doesn't affect their lives.
So the right to privacy for the celebrities should be respected the same as yours or mine. Now if we are talking about a political leader, and we find he acts contrary to what he is saying he will do, or about a religious leader, who acts like a hippocrite, that does affect the public. So information that justly disqualifies a public figure, is alright to disclose. Information just to satisfy people's curiosity (does so and so sleep in the same bed as his wife?) should be left in the waste bin where it belongs.

Answer 3

Fox has a constitutional precise to exist and say what it needs to declare. Like everyone else nonetheless it has to settle for the end results of its positions. Even elected officers do no longer would desire to volunteer to be interviewed by potential of people who're brazenly adverse. Bush replaced into in no way, in 8 years, interviewed by potential of the manhattan circumstances for plenty an identical motives, and he tried to shrink the venerable Helen Thomas. no longer one Republican went crying into the evening for them. Now that the tables are grew to become its substitute right into a super deal. i'm getting slightly aggravated whilst that occurs, so could everyone. If it replaced into stable adequate for Bush, it would have been stable adequate for Obama, and a minimum of the NYT is seen international-extensive to be a intense magazine. Even its supporters can no longer say an identical approximately FOX and Rupert Murdoch.