It's interesting to read that many of the posters say that he has done nothing wrong. Hummm. What about the torture thing? Or maybe getting more than a few good citizens killed under false pretense? How about breaking the Geneva Convention that was ratified and accepted by OUR elected officials? It probably will not happen but his term isn't over just yet . He has plenty of time to continue his anti-freedom like ways. You can't just make your own rules as you go. If every President decides to 'go their own way' no one would deal with us because we change leaders at least every eight years. Come on 2008. Out of the darkness and into the light of day. No more imperial secrets. Hold a real press conference for a change and oh, yeah. How about speaking to an audience that is not captive to the military or Republicans.
2006-11-16 13:35:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by Joe Schmo from Kokomo 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
Impeachment costs have already been introduced against Bush and Cheney by utilising Rep. Dennis Kucinich. the residing house Judiciary Committee did no longer, are actually not, and could never look at. no longer in effortless terms that yet residing house Speaker Pelosi won't enable the floor of the residing house to vote on impeachment. we would desire to besides face it, no rely how badly we choose those scumbags out of the White residing house, the Federal gov't is barely going to look out for itself and not us.
2016-10-15 15:52:50
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think that Bush is the greatest pesident either but you need to chill out. If he is impeached (which won't happen) then Dicky will become president and he isn't any better than Bush. It's easier to just wait til 2008.
2006-11-16 13:26:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by Habester 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
I don't believe that Bush is going to be impeached. He hasn't committed a crime worthy of such a consequence. Granted - he has made mistakes, but those are certainly not a reason for impeachment.
2006-11-16 13:33:17
·
answer #4
·
answered by meg s 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
ONLY if we are VERY lucky. The Democraps have never even said they were going after him. That is why I vote Independent. I am SICK of being lied to all the time.
2006-11-16 13:29:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
NO.
The democrats who had pushed for that are backing off it now. We realize we are going to have to work together with this president.
And oh, BTW (and I am no fan of Bush) I am offended by your screen name. Bush is not Hitler. Hitler was Hiltler.
2006-11-16 13:27:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by clueless_nerd 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Investigations will. I don't know how long they will investigate before deciding there are no facts to suport thier case but start proceedings anyhow.
2006-11-16 13:27:38
·
answer #7
·
answered by yupchagee 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
They better not.The Democrats all promised the people who voted for them bringing the troops home will be the first thing they do.So by Jan 20th or so, they should all be home, RIGHT??
2006-11-16 13:43:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by BAARAAACK 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
"If I said yes, that would then suggest that that might be the only place where it might be done which would not be accurate, necessarily accurate. It might also not be inaccurate, but I'm disinclined to mislead anyone."
2006-11-16 13:33:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by Quinn 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
They will begin as soon as Clinton stops raping women
2006-11-16 13:28:59
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋