If you had to choose between marrying a person you are head-over-heels in love with (but broke) or a person you could never even make yourself love but is worth millions of dollars, who would you choose......now be honest.......
2006-11-16 13:11:57 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Family & Relationships ➔ Marriage & Divorce
I've married for love; there's definitely no money. I would rather be comfortable and secure in a loving relationship than rich and lonely.
Money can buy material security, sure. And a lot of women marry with that in mind, i'm sure of it. I even had that oppotunity once. But that kind of life, with all it's superficial parties and who's wearing what, just wasnt true to who i am.
Love; a man who comes home for dinner every night, dirt on his work clothes, and goodness in his heart wins every time for me.
2006-11-16 13:21:55 · answer #1 · answered by harttattoo 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The longer I am married, the more I believe that marriage is about companionship and security rather than love. Yes, love inspires the marriage and sustains it through the tough times and it become a different love. The lustful love that begins a marriage turns into a love of companionship.
When the companionship is gone, I for one, am not going to try to find that lustful love. I'll probably be lucky to find an occasional companion and incidents of lust. Wealth can buy happiness with the right affluent person.
2006-11-16 13:25:53 · answer #2 · answered by zax_fl 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I've seen both trust me. And i would pick love any day of the week. Money isn't everythig. Sure i like the nice life but at what cost to sell your soul to man you don't love . Its not worth it you'll be a lonely person inside. and money can only buy you things but not really fullfil you the way you yearn inside. SO LOVE 100% and this man you llove who knows he may make money in life and do really well then thats icing on the cake but if not least you still have the real thing and not fake boughten love
2006-11-16 20:43:35 · answer #3 · answered by For ever in my Heart 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is easy, I would go for the love. Money can't hold you on a cold night and keep you warm. Money don't buy love anyway. The person with no money has a better head on their shoulders when it comes to a woman than the one with the money. Most people that I know that has money has a bad attitude toward other people anyway.
2006-11-16 13:26:12 · answer #4 · answered by SapphireB 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I chose love and it fuc_ed up on me so if i had the chance in a norther life time MONEY would be the go love hurts and having ship Lords of money you don't need to be in love as if you want sex you could buy what ever you like. money could also buy dam good toys so why fall in love toys are a girls best friend and they never fuc- around on you
2006-11-16 13:22:09 · answer #5 · answered by Raylene M 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you may opt for Love money could purchase a sprint happiness, yet no longer the happiness of actual love. You fairly have a real soulmate than a private jet. And jointly as a lot of human beings could declare they could opt for love too... you're between the few who could honestly do it.
2016-12-30 13:46:05 · answer #6 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
How do you know you could never love the rich one? lol..
Most are going to say "love" but lets face it love is a lot easier when you aren't fighting/worrying about money. That is one of the leading problems in marriage. So I vote "BOTH".
2006-11-16 18:10:42 · answer #7 · answered by Carey L 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
LOVE! Of course, that's hard to find, especially if he loves you back! But I don't fall in love with guys who aren't smart and capable, so, I don't think we would ever be poor anyway... and if we were, it wouldn't be for very long.
2006-11-16 13:15:05 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Love. You can always find a way to make money but you can not always find someone to love.
2006-11-16 13:46:43 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
the person i was head over heels for
2006-11-16 13:17:21 · answer #10 · answered by Dianna 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋