English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-11-16 11:39:49 · 9 answers · asked by Robert H 1 in Games & Recreation Video & Online Games

9 answers

This kind of adds the Wii too, because the Wii needs to be put into this. Next-gen debate.

Srry if this sounds awkward at points for meh grammer.

Price = 600
but, that is for the expensive one. The Xbox 360 (premium) costs $400, and the Wii (only version thus far) $250 ($650). This is not including controllers where the Wii is going to have $60 remotes, not including the add ons for the remotes, and online costs of the 360 (which is pretty much the whole system). Meh, I can live without rumble, the PS3 focuses on quick load times and multimedia capabilities. To replace one feature (rumble) is not a big issue. I like the old games. I don't want to get a game that is just a spinoff. Remember that the blue ray component costs $1000 alone. That means that they got people in Asia that are working in video game sweat shops so we don't complain about $600, us stupid, ungratefull Americans...

I do think that the Wii is a fun system, but I don't think it is going to be so much cheaper thanks to the outrageous controller costs. I myself am getting a PS3 and a Wii.

2006-11-16 11:46:41 · answer #1 · answered by Yuri Slavio 4 · 0 0

Wii! Then 360. I'm not paying $500 for a gaming system. Not to mention that anyone at all can pick up a Wiimote and start playing. PS3 is WAY complicated with buttone AND motion sensing on a traditional controller. 360 is the midway point between too complicated and technologically illiterate family friendly.

2006-11-16 11:53:53 · answer #2 · answered by Kevin H 3 · 0 0

jointly as the PS3 has technical superiority and the further income of Blu-Ray, which will quickly supplant DVD as a results of fact the industry universal, XBOX 360 only has the final and maximum diverse determination of video games. Plus, you get oftentimes happening franchises like Halo, Gears of conflict etc. For the greater youthful or much less extreme game enthusiasts, the Wii is honestly a greater useful determination, as a results of fact the video games tend to be designed around novices, toddlers or the elderly. in spite of the actual undeniable fact that, the Wii's old technologies, infantile administration scheme and constrained sport determination make it a marginally damaging determination for any different than the main casual game enthusiasts. additionally, even although that's the main inexpensive, it fairly is by using far the toughest to locate.

2016-12-30 13:44:12 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

I think people may have misconcern on PS3, becasue it is not as expensive as you think it is. You can get one with $450 U.S. during the SonyStyle on December 15th, 2006.

After all, just stick with ur computer, trust me, u will find all the games u want on computer-.- and u can play them online...
and i am sure that u do have one...

2006-11-16 11:54:42 · answer #4 · answered by aCe 1 · 0 0

Xbox 360 (too lazy to explain why so I'll hope someone else does it for me)

2006-11-16 11:42:37 · answer #5 · answered by Zikro 5 · 0 0

for the best money can buy, go with the PS3

2006-11-16 12:29:40 · answer #6 · answered by darkpheonix262 4 · 0 0

Neither one of them because they are both a rip off and really my opinion should'nt matter because i don't play when i was in Elementary when recess came around I went home because I don't play LOL

2006-11-16 11:45:48 · answer #7 · answered by ~MISS SEXINESS~ 2 · 0 1

Both, and the Wii.

2006-11-16 11:44:42 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i dunno but i heard ps3 is better. but if u ask me ill stick to the xbox 360

2006-11-16 11:43:00 · answer #9 · answered by crayzmamii 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers