English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

the PS3 coming out tommorrow and the wii coming out on sunday. i would say the best console thats out is xbox 360
here are my ranks (1 the best)
1)xbox 360

2)wii

3)PS3

some of you may be surprised that i picked PS3 to be the worst out of the 3, after two generations of sony winning the battles between the companys. This years its xbox 360's year and nintendo. to start xbox 360 has a amazing online features, and surprising nintendo wii has a good online too! as for PS3 it will be the same as PS2 online, where the game publishers have too get create there own online for the game. This means not all games of PS3 will be compatible for online play, where as the nintendo and the xbox, all games will be online because the console created online play, whitch is great!! yes, the PS3 will win for graphics, however graphics are great but they don't make a game. as for blueray, i don't think anyone will care for this feature. i gave my final remarks for the consoles, now i need your re

2006-11-16 11:34:15 · 17 answers · asked by soccerfan10td 2 in Games & Recreation Video & Online Games

17 answers

I personally support the PS3, but don't lose me. Please read my paragraph explaining why. I hope this changes the bias that you are getting from other gamers.

Srry if this sounds awkward at points for meh grammer.

Price = 600
but, that is for the expensive one. The Xbox 360 (premium) costs $400, and the Wii (only version thus far) $250 ($650). This is not including controllers where the Wii is going to have $60 remotes, not including the add ons for the remotes, and online costs of the 360 (which is pretty much the whole system). Meh, I can live without rumble, the PS3 focuses on quick load times and multimedia capabilities. To replace one feature (rumble) is not a big issue. I like the old games. I don't want to get a game that is just a spinoff. Remember that the blue ray component costs $1000 alone. That means that they got people in Asia that are working in video game sweat shops so we don't complain about $600, us stupid, ungratefull Americans...

I do think that the Wii is a fun system, but I don't think it is going to be so much cheaper thanks to the outrageous controller costs. I myself am getting a PS3 and a Wii.

Final decision:

1.) PS3

2.) Wii

3.) Xbox 360

2006-11-16 12:00:48 · answer #1 · answered by Yuri Slavio 4 · 0 0

Well here goes:

1. Wii

2. 360

3. PS3

The reasons I chose this order was because nintendo is basically the grandpa of all 3 systems... they've been around since the beginning and have done everything from new systems to gameboys...at this point of the game anybody who's anybody has been able to see that nintendo makes quality products with really good games, and with the most creativity...so I don't think their that much of a dumba** to put out something crappy into the market at this point... the wii is going to be as well as a competitor as sony and 360..with the difference of being able to download classic games and the motion sensor gameplay which gives the player a sense of actually being in the game...360 is also a kicka** console...being just as good as the wii...I thinks its also a great buy but not too long ago when it was released some people had problems with their console and some would breakdown...my brothers both had xboxs and both experinced problems with the consoles one way or another...don't get me wrong...its far better then the ps3 (my opinion) and its games are wicked awesome, maybe even better then nintendos previous....ps3...well what can I say...the loading is slow..sometimes the graphics aren't the best and I find the controller confusing...so all in all I say wii or 360...if ur rich :)

2006-11-16 12:12:51 · answer #2 · answered by hott 1 · 0 0

1) Wii - people easily forget or dont give enough credit to the amazing games that Nintendo develops. With the added innovation of the Wiimote, the sky's the limit on how fun and different games can be. Nintendo is always creating new ways to play. They will offer games for little kids to grandparents, and of course also to the hardcore gamers. Something for everyone.

2) PS3 - Software developers cannot ignore the immense popularity of the PS2. In the short run the PS3 will do worst than any of the 3, but I think with its luxury components and maybe with how well BluRay does, it will hook potential HD DVD buyers. Hower, in the long run it will just do more of the same of what the PS2 is already doing, just with better graphics. Because of its high price, it will definately scare off many potential customers.

3) XBox360 - Yes, it got a 1 year head start, but didnt capitalize last xmas with shortages. Microsoft loses money with every Xbox sold, just like Sony with the PS3, but the difference is that Sony whooped the competition last time around, and actually made profits with the software. Microsoft can take their Xbox and their Zune and flush them down the toilet.

2006-11-16 12:41:45 · answer #3 · answered by GoNinjaGo 3 · 0 0

You speak words of wisdom. I don't know how Sony keeps winning th console wars; The N64 was better than the PS1, The Xbox was way better than the PS2, and the Xbox 360 is clearly the superior console. The Wii is also a good console, the system is all about the motion sensor controller and old school games. The PS3's online service may be free, but the extra $50 for Xbox Live adds so much more to online play.

2006-11-16 11:42:52 · answer #4 · answered by Dr. Stupid 5 · 1 0

Dude, you're wrong. Sure, I'd put PS3 at the bottom, too, but for a different reason: TOO DAMNED EXPENSIVE!!! And they bite from Nintendo and Microsoft. Their controller is motion senstive, but in all the wrong ways. And they have a "home" button in the center (I hear).

Not all games from Microsoft are online compatible, and same with the future of Nintendo. The Wii is always connected to the internet, so it's not the game that's online, unless it's a pecified title. The same pretty much goes for the 360, just at a higher price and the log-on sequence. And PS3 is supposed to have a setup like the 360 (almost exactly like it), including a marketplace for game mods and addins, and an eventual "virtual console"esque PS1 download area. going online for both Sony and Nintendo is free. Downloads cost some.

I place the Wii at the top for its inventiveness, price effectiveness, and family wannaplayness. 360 second for killer graphics and game, but at a better price than Sony. PS# falls behind because of the $500 price tag for a not sweet system, though their graphics are sweet, and I'm interested in the card game with the eyetoy.

2006-11-16 11:46:59 · answer #5 · answered by Kevin H 3 · 0 0

1) 360
2) Wii
3) PS3

I do agree with u but for different reasons. PS3 are too expensive and i don't think PS3 isn't a good deal at all. I am not so interested in Wii either. To be honest, i don't think Wii and PS3 are good systems. 360 in another hand, is affordable and u can get internet access with 360 easily.

At last, i think PSP is the most system out there, because of the whenever movie watching, and whenever wireless internet. O.o

2006-11-16 11:45:42 · answer #6 · answered by aCe 1 · 0 0

How can you rate something that is not out, yet? The XBox has a good head start, but I want to see how all the systems compare in a year or so. It will take time to develop great games and really make the systems work well. The PS3 is going to need a little time to play catch up, I think. We'll see how well Sony has done their homework.

2006-11-16 11:42:13 · answer #7 · answered by Nc Jay 5 · 1 0

It was clear that the cost of producing PS3 units were high for Sony, forcing the company to charge $600 per unit, but now we know exactly how high. Next-gen.biz has offered a full analysis of Sony's expenses. As it turns out, Sony is losing $306.85 for each 20GB system sold and $241.35 for every 60GB system.

The full production cost for a 20GB system is a whopping $805.85, with the 60 GB coming in at $840.35. Chief among the expenses are the RSX graphics chip at $129 and the Blu-Ray optical drive at $125.

The bottom line is that no matter what it costs Sony to make one, you only have to pay $600 to own it. In that sense, you're getting a hell of a bargain when you purchase a PS3.

2006-11-16 18:02:37 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

the ps3 will have the best graphics of them all. The price is too much but just wait untill christmas, it will drop by hundreds. Wii wont be to good. Nintendo always comes in last compared to xbox and ps. They dont have great graphics but they are cheaper. im gonna buy the ps3 once the price drops.

2006-11-18 08:03:24 · answer #9 · answered by kid19912 1 · 0 0

The PS3 is my first choice, but it is definitely shrouded in mystery. Some of the first PS2's caught fire cuz they overheated. XBOX 360 is a great system, and I really love playin it, but I think it needs more compelling titles. Cant wait for HALO 3! BTW, Halo 2 has great new stuff on the 360, and all the previously pricey map packs are free now. I myself have not used a Wii before but I heard it will be a breakthrough in video gaming tech. Overall though, I am psyched about getting my hands on PS3 premium.

2006-11-16 11:40:37 · answer #10 · answered by jhswim07 2 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers