"Very Low Food Security" instead of "Hungry".
Does that sound like a good change to you?
2006-11-16 10:43:53 · 9 answers · asked by Clarkie 6 in Social Science ➔ Psychology
Very low food security? That's Bullshit. He's just trying to make it sound less important so he won't have to do anything.
2006-11-16 10:52:03 · answer #1 · answered by epitome of innocence 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Actually, Bush had nothing to do with it. It was a sociologist who thought " hungry " did not sound scientific. Of course, that does not matter to the knee-jerk types that haunt this site. Not likely one considered opinion or fact will be offered to this question.
2006-11-16 20:08:44 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I bet someone will make a fortune when they publish a book called "Bushisms" So what does he intend to do about "Low food security"? I'm sure it won't by be increasing food stamps or adding funding to food pantries or raising financial eligibility guidelines or making sure people can find god paying jobs either.
2006-11-16 19:19:08 · answer #3 · answered by GRANNY12GR1 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It is called political correctness - putting a more acceptable face on something that is bad. It is a bad idea, and Bush should concentrate his efforts on helping such people rather than wasting time making up new fancy names.
2006-11-16 18:52:17 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
a small change very small change you know when we were bombing iraq bush sent millions and millions of dollars of food over there to them to feed the innocent ell you know what what about our innocents what about our starving people instead of feeding the towleheads why dont he feed the americans that voted for him anyways polotics is not a good thing to be talking about
2006-11-16 18:59:38 · answer #5 · answered by AMANDA W 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
lets rename 9/11 as "buSH on vacaTIon" just to clarify things
2006-11-16 19:02:16 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
haha. while hes at it he should change his ratings from "low" to "low security in rating"
2006-11-16 18:52:07 · answer #7 · answered by LaurenElizabeth 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
No, but's sounds more nice, that's the government work.
2006-11-16 18:48:30 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
no hungry is hungry and in bushes case an idiot is an idiot.
2006-11-16 18:47:36 · answer #9 · answered by elliepenelly 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋