People are just jealous so they criticize Michael for everything he does!! Michael has never had a bad performance because he is not capable of giving a bad one!!
♥♥We Love You Michael!!!!♥♥
2006-11-16 13:28:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by ♥Stranger In Maine™♥ (Thriller) 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
The reason his performance was considered pants has nothing to do with whether or not he is guilty or not guilty. It was because everyone was expecting an amazing comeback from him and intsead all they got were a few mumbled lines before he fled from the stage. I think even the most devoted fans of Michael have a right to be disappointed after that.
2006-11-16 22:29:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think people are always looking for a reason to talk about Michael Jackson and since the whole child molestation cases, huge really can't do enough to gain respect for his music and performances form the public. They will always slate him whether he does well or not. i personally think it was great, i loved every minute of it and wish him the best...I will always be a die hard fan!!! By the way the man was found not guilty for the charges, alltof them...so he is innocent!!! Please respect that and not use it as a reasont o charge him. You weren't there, you don't know if he did do it, the court couldn't prove it!
2006-11-16 10:36:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by Chaz 2
·
4⤊
0⤋
I don't think coming on stage surrounded by children was the smartest move. I mean, I thought he was going to sing Thriller, and instead he throws his I am going to sace you all act. What we want him to do is sing the way he can, and the way that no one else can! He is unique. But, I don't want him to try to save my life. I don't want him to preach about the world. I follow politics for that. Michael Jackson is nobody's saviour. He's a popstar. And he needs to do more of that. The bottom line is that you can't fool the people .... Michael, stop fooling us!
2006-11-16 21:26:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Jackson is a disgraceful unconvicted paedophile and as such should be shunned by anyone with a right mind. He is a fu*cking dangerous pervert and a disgrace.
Pretty Helen should also realise that he wasn't proven innocent, there was sufficient doubt to stop him being proved guilty. There is a big difference between innocent, and unconvicted guilt, and he is as guilty as hell.
2006-11-16 11:46:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by Phish 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
i admire the entire undesirable outfit my fav and a few gold pants and bear in mind the time too. candy yeah he makes adult men to faint no longer with the help of his sexiness yet with the help of his coolness. i'm listening to highway walker precise now
2016-12-29 03:17:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by goldie 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
What on earth are you trying to say? He is not a fruitcake.
2006-11-16 12:41:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by Rightfield_99 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
He only sang for four minutes with a choir of children, they reckon he only muttered the words and did not sing properly and the poor buggers paid £75.00 a ticket to see him, I would be annoyed, he was booed off the stage.
2006-11-16 10:41:01
·
answer #8
·
answered by Kirks Folley 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
i don't care if he got found not guilty as far as I'm concerned he should not be allowed near any kids ever again look at the way he is with his own covering there faces, hanging them over balconies, sleeping in the same bed with other peoples kids need i go on. how anyone can think he is great is beyond me
2006-11-16 11:39:16
·
answer #9
·
answered by girljak 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
Cause the tickets cost £100 each and he only did three songs!
2006-11-17 00:06:17
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋