Honestly, I am not trying to pull a joke nor am I trying to be sarcastic. The Bush Regime had about 4 group of people.
1. The Corporations = Cheney, Exxon, The Scowcroft Group
2. The Jews who were promised full security for Israel and wealth if Bush won the White House = Canadian Frum, Wolfowitz, Perle, Kristol, Libby , Kissinger ect....
3. Joe Wilson & others who really thought they were serving the United State but got the boot for working
4. The Christians who really thought that Bush was a man of God. The Christians that really wanted a moral United State. The Christians that were concerned about the direction of the United State after two fags kissed on stage celebrating the victory of Bill Clinton. The Christians that were concerned about the rising crimes in the United State. I share all of your concerns too but you guys just jumped on the wrong boat.
Maybe a fat devil, on viagra, is whispering too much fake news into Christians' ears?
2006-11-16 10:13:18 · 6 answers · asked by Taco 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Unfortunately, even now they are not. Anyone can make mistakes. So, electing him first time is understandable. But re-electing him is shocking. Supporting him even now is completely beyond my grasp.
2006-11-16 10:17:16 · answer #1 · answered by ramshi 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
i did not vote for Bush, and that i do not take every person else's suggestion as actuality. i opt for to study each and each and every of the applicants and choose the single which i imagine matches the criteria ideal for the placement being filled. As a christian I worry about values yet i'm the single which handles the flaws my children watch, examine, and hear and or play on the pc. i'm very tolerant of all aspects of fantastically a lot any project yet i'm not above calling a spade a spade. I also am not afraid or ashamed to confess that I make blunders and fall short of the grace of God myself upon party and subsequently even as i will condemn a sin i can't usher every person into hell as i'm not a in good structure choose nor jury for that. And if i concept I had jumped onto the incorrect boat, i will only as honestly leap deliver or bypass down with it..whichever is necessitated.
2016-11-24 23:12:31 · answer #2 · answered by brim 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Um...I'm still on that boat. I have not seen Bush do anythign that would make me think he is 'not christian enough'. Nothing you have mentioned is even a major topic or why Bush is disliked. The religion has little to do with this change of likeness.
2006-11-16 11:11:31 · answer #3 · answered by Squawkers 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
All politicians are liars. As a matter of fact, the word "candidates" should be changed because it has the word "candid" in it. But Bush just takes the cake for being a stereotypical paragon for lying politicians.
2006-11-16 10:17:00 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i agree with you most of Americans vote on there moral feelings not on what the economy is going to be like. look at the economy during bill Clinton's administration it was great! but he didn't have many moral values. so people were ready for a change. just like in the recent elections people are ready for a change so they vote democrat. in my opinion they need to set there moral issues and religion aside to vote. that's why we are suppose to have a separation of church and state.
2006-11-16 12:29:27 · answer #5 · answered by Kenneth P 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I DIDN'T VOTE FOR BUSH BECAUSE OF RELIGIOUS REASONS! LIKE MOST I PUT MY FAITH IN GOD AND NOT MAN! I AM FOR THE PERSON I LIKE PERIOD,JUST IMAGINE IF IT WOULD HAVE BEEN KERRY OR GORE! WHAT A DISASTER THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN HUH?
2006-11-16 10:17:42 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋