Now that BUSH has admitted that explosives were involved in 9/11 what next?

Question

I mean, before it was a categoric NO, but now it seems that they are admitting the possiblity (certitude if you ask me) that explosives were involved in the WTC freefall-speed demolitions. That kind of demolition takes weeks if not months of planning - you can't just set a bomb in a steel building and expect it to crumble! At least it will topple over, not fall in it's footprint. WTF????

GEORGE W. BUSH: "That is valuable information for those of us who have the responsibility to protect the American people. He told us the operatives had been instructed to ensure that the explosives went off at a high -- a point that was high enough to prevent people trapped above from escaping."

SOURCE: The WHITE HOUSE.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/09/20060915-2.html

Now stop insulting me you pack of uneducated uninformed slobs who are talking about alien probes and tin foil and all that crap!

Thank you.

Answer 1

interesting allegation.........please provide source
ARE YOU REFERRING TO this whitehouse speech?
Did Muslims blow up the WTC buildings on 9/11, if George W. Bush admits explosives were used?
WHITEHOUSE WEBSITE:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/...

Press Conference of the President, The Rose Garden, 11:15 A.M. EDT

"For example, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed described the design of planned attacks
of buildings inside the U.S. and how operatives were directed to carry them
out. That is valuable information for those of us who have the responsibility
to protect the American people. He told us the operatives had been instructed
to ensure that the explosives went off at a high -- a point that was high
enough to prevent people trapped above from escaping."

it is amazing how this was totally ignored by everyone.I read the whole speech.It wasnt taken out of context.............

Answer 2

Umm, where did he admit this? I have not seen anything on the news about it. If it had happened then I would bet that there would be a ton of coverage on it. Do you have a link to a news site with an article?

ADDED SINCE HE GAVE A SOURCE:
Umm, dude, read your article again. He did not say that this was about the 9/11 attack. He seems to be describing a description of a thwarted plan or of possible plans that have not been acted out yet. You took your quote out of context. The previous paragraph says

"The information that the Central Intelligence Agency has obtained by questioning men like Khalid Sheikh Mohammed has provided valuable information and has helped disrupt terrorist plots, including strikes within the United States. "

Also, lets say it did apply to 9/11. Umm, dude, he is describing how the terrorists were instructed on how to use bombings in high rises. I don't think that the terrorists on the planes would have bothered with explosives. Those planes were more than enough. Also, they wanted to get on the planes without being caught. Bringing bombs with them would have increased the odds of getting caught. Even if this is so, then, umm, dude, it is still the terrorists carrying the bomb, not some government operative.

Answer 3

Got a link for this admission? There was no thermite, all the conspiracy theories are so full of holes as to be complete fiction. The so called "experts" pushing these theories are at best amateur attention whores and are so sorely outnumbered and outclassed by the ones who really studied the site it is amazing they get as much press as they do.


edit:removed a phrase that might have been ..not so nice.

Also, the people who did the popular mechanics investigation (more than 300) are accredited experts in their individual fields. Many more informed websites out there, just have to do a Google or Dogpile search.

Answer 4

Watch the towers falling. they do no longer seem to be collapsing at 9.81m/s^2. the twin towers have been towers(marvel) and the airplanes hit them close to the proper. the wear finished with the help of the airplane and right here hearth brought about the proper to fail crashing down and forcing something of the construction down. Why could it have a attitude to the autumn no remember if this is falling from the proper down in the direction of earth. controlled demolitions artwork their way up or do it abruptly(for small homes). this is the real be conscious. I revolves around physics which for sure you be conscious of no longer something approximately.

Answer 5

You all need to stop with the 9/11 conspiracy theory. I'm not a Bush supporter, but PLEASE!!!!!!!!

btw....it has been proven that the very high temperatures could cause a structure beam to fail, and collapse the building.

Answer 6

I believe it was the Easter bunny that put
them in the towers and camoflaged them
as eggs. Then Santa pushed the button
and set them off.
C'mon, be real, don't be a kool-aid drinker
and believe every nutty thing you hear or
read.

Answer 7

1) proof

2) you are dumb aren't you. They blow up buildings everyday that fall into their own foot print

3) JP-4 is explosive by the nature of the combustion necessary for flight.

4) When are the roswell aliens coming back to give you another anal probe?

Answer 8

What do you mean "What next?" Ask the flippin' terrorists what next.

What are the democrats going to do to keep our country safe?

Answer 9

I think the demolition had more to do with the f**in huge holes slammed into them by two f**ng airplanes ??

Answer 10

It will be interesting to see how the cover-up mutates as it ages.