English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

33 answers

He's so arrogant he'd definitely write this book telling what really happened. He knows he can't ever be put on trial for the murders again due to Double Jeopardy. He's so excited to tell his "hypothesis" of how the murders might have occured he's probably wetting himself with excitement. He's going to tell us exactly how he did it to rub our noses in the fact that he fooled 12 people and walked away a free man. This guy is the most twisted piece of garbage who ever breathed oxygen. His poor kids.

2006-11-16 08:56:16 · answer #1 · answered by Debra D 7 · 1 0

I've met Leslie Nielson, who worked with O.J. on the Naked Gun movies and even he said that O.J. is guilty, and this was in front of a packed lecture theatre at my university. Killing someone is a horrific thing to do, but at least some killers will admit what they've done and serve time in prison for it. Not only does he have no respect for human life, he has no respect for the families of his victims and no respect for the law. They should lock him up and throw away the key, and the publishers should be shut down.

2006-11-16 09:46:24 · answer #2 · answered by homeandawayrules 3 · 1 0

i think its disgusting that someone would publish that book and run an interview on television. stop pouring salt in an open wound for the brown and goldman families. any money made (which hopefully will be none b/c he doesn't deserve a penny) should go to the families. he still hasn't paid the money he owes from the civil suit. he is pathetic to use such a tragedy to try and make a few dollars.

2006-11-16 08:50:12 · answer #3 · answered by atruddie 3 · 0 0

Now that he can't be tried for it, yes i do think it is an admission of guilt. Maybe he'll come out with his own product line of black gloves too! Or, the new & improved Ford Bronco 'OJ Edition'

2006-11-16 08:43:41 · answer #4 · answered by Rob & Rach 4 · 0 0

I so agree!! That's the first thing I said to myself when I heard about the book. It's like he's sorta confessing but not like openly.. He's been having this guilt on him for like 11 years now, and he wants it out.. You see, take away the "If", and we are left with 'I did it'..... He's so guilty.

2006-11-16 09:43:17 · answer #5 · answered by sshhmmee2000 6 · 0 0

That slimey sleazball, load of garbage would never admit his guilt.
He only wrote the book for money. And that's all he's got to talk about and maybe some stupid people might buy his book. That's what he's counting on. No one should have published it. He belongs on Death Row.
I can't stand to look at him.

2006-11-16 08:47:04 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Yes

2006-11-16 09:52:12 · answer #7 · answered by David 6 · 0 0

a. I have no intention of reading this book
b. Some people really like a good scandal (ie robert blake, jon benet)
c. Perhaps OJ is trying to make a buck and also challenge the justice system, ehh it all makes me sick

2006-11-16 08:54:59 · answer #8 · answered by mvgirl719 2 · 0 0

I think he is guilty but I think the book is much more about his admission of greed.... he just needs money.

He does not deserve to profit from the deaths.

2006-11-16 09:58:14 · answer #9 · answered by sofro123 1 · 0 0

Maybe. It doesn't matter anyway as he can't be prosecuted again but if he could, he'd buy his way out of it again.

It's only a way for him to make money to pay off the Goldmans anyway.

2006-11-16 08:44:05 · answer #10 · answered by WHY? 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers