2006-11-16 08:03:52 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Music
Does anyone have proof, or am I supposed to just believe the majority?
2006-11-16 08:10:11 · update #1
Techically, yes, but it is pledged as collateral on some debt, so he probably wont own them much longer.
2006-11-16 08:05:14 · answer #1 · answered by Rum_Punch_Girlie 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes
2006-11-16 08:09:34 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
nicely i assumed the two his mom or different contributors of the family members. apparently the music business corporation needs to sell it... grrr stop merchandising each and every thing of michael's and do away with the assumption of in no way land being a vacationer charm! >:| stupid human beings (no longer you the folk doing it lol)
2016-10-04 01:11:22 · answer #3 · answered by mauzon 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He did, but I think he had to sell them in order to pay back all his debts.
It's probabally better this way, I hate seeing a weirdo like that handling the music of 4 geniuses.
I still think they would have been MUCH better off with Paul.
It was HIS music anyway...
2006-11-16 08:10:14 · answer #4 · answered by Lauren C.: Led-head 4 (∞) 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yeah but I don't know why he would want to own the rights of some talentless sucky band like that!!
♥♥We Love You Michael!!!!♥♥
2006-11-16 09:44:14 · answer #5 · answered by ♥Stranger In Maine™♥ (Thriller) 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes, but if the rumors are true about his finances, not for long.
2006-11-16 08:11:49 · answer #6 · answered by Bruce L 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
yes
2006-11-16 08:05:31 · answer #7 · answered by Sharp Marble 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think he sold them two years ago but I could be wrong.
2006-11-16 08:05:14 · answer #8 · answered by goingfasterbmw 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no
2006-11-16 08:06:44 · answer #9 · answered by samdrian 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋