Since you're obviously new to the game of rhetorical slandering, I'll go easy this time and offer a bit of advice:
Examine closely which party most resembles the Marxist doctrine, and try again.
Fozzy: if I could give thumbs up, I'd give you one.
nice lesson.
2006-11-16 07:35:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 4
·
5⤊
0⤋
Civics lesson:
1 - G. W. Bush is not an emperor, he was elected President.
2 - Marxism is about as far from Republican as you can get. Just because Marxism has a bad reputation, it does not mean that you can compare the two and make Republicans look bad.
3 - There is no need to lower the price of health care. No one is denied necessary medical care - whether or not they have insurance. The whole idea of government health care is just a way for the government to take over one of the biggest industries in the US. You've seen what they've done with every other program, yet you trust them with your very life?
2006-11-16 07:52:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by FozzieBear 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Jihad: Denotes non secular war. the U. S. administration purely cares approximately money, ability and not the rest. it is not a non secular war. Marxist: Marxism is an thought of socialism which states that the oppression of the working classification via the "the Aristocracy" will finally convey approximately a revolt via the staff and the corporation of a classless society. I.E. the alternative of what the U. S. administration needs. Nazi: Denotes Fascism and much extra against Jewish. 0.5 of the U. S. administration is made out of Jewish people. additionally, united states of america and Israel have marvelous relationship or maybe share various worry-unfastened targets (distinctly for the midsection East and Asia-Minor) Republicans: returned.. all of us understand Bush, comparable as his father and Reagan, is a Neo-Conservative puppet no longer, I repeat, no longer a Republican. I trust your ordinary thought, yet please get your information suited first!
2016-10-22 05:13:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
NO
Bush has no concept of health care. All his life he has been treated by a family owned doctor.
Go big Red Go
2006-11-16 08:08:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Only to given the impression that the GOP likes people and buoy their chances to retain the White House in 08
2006-11-16 07:44:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Well if the democrats would had done tort reform the cost would not be so higher your party messsed you over, also marxist are leftiest just like liberals have a nice day.
2006-11-16 07:34:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
It's not the government's place to modify prices. Health care is not a constitutional right.
2006-11-16 07:38:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by only p 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Unless the Democrats start taking the war on terror seriously, the cost of health care will be a moot subject.
2006-11-16 07:50:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by LeAnne 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
Dude, you SERIOUSLY need to learn history if you want to hurl some ACCURATE insults...
Anyhow... The GOP has wanted to work with the dems for SIX YEARS!!! But all the left has cared about is obstructionism... Bah.
2006-11-16 07:40:46
·
answer #9
·
answered by Firestorm 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
since when are republicans considered marxist? oh and republicans (capitalist/imperialist) are the ones that look bad, not marxists.
2006-11-16 10:35:51
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋