(debate) Do u feel that marijuana should be legalized?

Answer 1

Marijuana smoking should be legalised everywhere.
It is a simple natural herb, which provides pleasure and relaxation, and has many beneficial medicinal properties. It relieves stress, reduces pain, and certain studies show that it can disipate asthma, and be beneficial to alzheimer's patients.
The reason it was made illegal in the first place was because the oil from the seeds can be used to fuel an engine, and so the oil lobby, along with the media who were making profits from cutting down trees, found a way to make it illegal. The law was passed as a part of the tax law, which introduced the name marijuana, so that nobody would realise that they were restricting the use of hemp.

Answer 2

Marijuana is the biggest funds crop contained in the rustic. Its highway value exceeds that of corn or wheat. So, it’s not as although the drug is unavailable. And the individuals who improve tremendous parts of marijuana and hemp are literally not in employer to grant paper generators. I don’t trust we could continually legalize pot purely because “everybody is going to apply it no matter if it’s legal or not.” If that replaced into solid common sense, shall we've some clods demanding the legalization of rape and homicide. And state-licensed medical marijuana guidelines are a comic book tale. some medical doctors have charged $250.00 only for writing a script that enabled a “affected human being” who claimed he had a sore left eyebrow to purchase weed legally. No offense, yet I don’t imagine you’re going to get everywhere arguing that anti-marijuana guidelines violate your civil rights or that weed is a cousin of alcohol and tobacco or that God gave each and every seed-bearing herb to guy to apply. I haven’t smoked a joint in a minimum of 25 years and that i don’t care if it’s accessible or not, yet those who do favor it would want to, i imagine, have more effective success arguing that that is a privateness difficulty: What you do contained in the privateness of your human being residence is your employer, not the authorities’s. That doesn’t mean you may hatch a conspiracy, construct a bomb, or communicate over with an al Qaeda operative in Kabul from the privateness of your position. the reason behind those bans is that what you do at residing house doesn’t stay at residing house. yet smoking some weed isn't step #a million in a plan to flow out and terrorize your associates or blow up a progression. The AMA disputes the concept that marijuana is medically necessary. Its position is that there are “probability-free” drugs which will provide you an similar advantages claimed for pot without the negative aspects posed by the evil weed. I have heard of a few recent study that instruct marijuana use may bring about severe psychoses. I also recognize that, decrease back contained in the Fifties, medical doctors acknowledged in classified ads for cigarette organizations and cautioned one kind over yet another. and that i recognize that many medical doctors prescribed anti-depressants like Prozac to little ones until eventually too many “satisfied” childrens committed suicide after taking the “probability-free” drug. provide it a shot. you've not something to lose yet a pair of money in taxes and a conceivable legal conviction which will ruin your existence as honestly as a drawer finished of pot ever might want to.

Answer 3

All substances should be legal. The cost to society to try to suppress the human desire for drugs is astronomical. It has not worked, it makes drugs that would otherwise be cheap very expensive and therefore leads to organized crime and stealing on the part of the users, it clogs our courts and prisons with tot tally unnecessary problems, it makes our police busy with the criminalization of drugs, and it causes the creation of drugs like meth that would not be made and used if they were not so expensive. The idea of drugs being illegal is lunacy and horrible public policy. To spend hundreds of billions of dollars each year to prevent people from doing what they are going to do anyway is silly, and you have to ask who is benefiting from this policy when it obviously does not work. Follow the money!

Answer 4

yes, only because my husband and I have seen several Discovery channel, PBS etc. (and done research on our own) and found that basicaly it's a weed and it was only made illeagal by politicians long ago for their own political reasons. They made up a stamp to put on pkgs. to use/sell but then never made the stamp sooo if you sell it w/out this "stamp" then it's illeagal etc.
For every thing you put up saying it's bad their is 1 or 2 reasons it's good. How can you say "let's use it for medical purposes" but then turn around and say it's "bad for you". I think Alaska and Nevada have the way to go. You can have only what like an ounce or something? Personal useage, and no more. Only specified companies (ie: like tabacco) can have more to sell it or grow your own you can have so many plants. etc. People need to get over it. We need to concentrate on getting rid of the man made drugs that destroy your body/brain etc.

Answer 5

Well, my take is a little different.

I feel that it never should have been criminalized. I never have trusted do-gooders who are stealing rights and freedoms in the name of 'for the children' or 'for your own good'. It's just another form of tyranny.

I'll take the exhilirating contest of liberty over the chains of the nanny-state any day.

I don't even smoke the stuff, but in a free country, like the US used to be, I'd have the choice to without criminal repercussion.

Answer 6

I am 39 never did don't intend to but YES i agree it needs to be legalized. It will cut down on teens selling it and ruining their lives. Make it an age thing just like voting, smoking, drinking and driving!

Answer 7

Yes. For personal use, sold and controlled in stores just like cigs and liquor. Over 21 or over 18 only, let each state decide. Also any state that chooses not to sell or allow, that's fine.

Answer 8

Well, all the research says it is less addictive, destructive, hindering and altering then alcohol. In fact most of the research say it just makes you want to eat cookie dough.

But there isn't enough money to be made, yet.

Answer 9

Yes to a point. If someone is chronically ill and is going to die soon, then yes, they should get marijuana to help them to enjoy their last days, but doctors should come up with a way for people to take it without smoking it.
As for the people who are not chronically ill, they don't need it.

Answer 10

yes i do the USA government would save a lot of money in not trying to combat this low level crime plus it is good for medical purpose