...voicing free speech?
I'm conservative, but have several gay acquaintances who do not offend or bother me in any way. I may disagree with them, but hell I disagree with most my acquaintences for one reason or another. It is no reason to treat them differently. I am sure most you other conservatives are in agreement.
2006-11-16 05:25:29 · 14 answers · asked by El Pistolero Negra 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Dems mention it to get votes.
And of course they never go on and on about anything...yeah, right.
2006-11-16 05:31:45 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 5⤋
You are right. Homosexuality only becomes an issue when a handful of judges decide ti rewrite the Constitution or some gay activists try to shove everyone's face in it. Live & let live.
As I understand the Bible, homosexuality is no worse than eating pork.
2006-11-16 05:56:15 · answer #2 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i imagine it relies upon which Bible you bypass with. you're surely proper, operating example in a million Corinthians 6: 9 of the King James version, Paul has this to assert on the count number: "understand ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the dominion of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind..." that can honestly be interpreted to be speaking about the act itself. except for the effeminate area. What the heck does he even propose through that? possibly... fairly camp, or some thing. yet interior a similar passage from the recent American accepted Bible, this turns into: "Or do you not keep in mind that the unrighteous gained't inherit the dominion of God? do not be deceived; neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor homosexuals..." that is a lot extra the overall sexuality. that is why i imagine many Christians imagine homosexuality is incorrect, complete stop. They have not been uncovered to early variations of the Bible (KJV is through a techniques better :P ) that make this massive difference - in case you want to interpret it that way. for my area i have not a subject matter with adult males doing in spite of they want with one yet another. yet that is how i imagine Christians will be made extra accepting of homosexuality - supply them an previous Bible. except they are only being homophobic for personal, extremely than religious causes, which I worry is all too oftentimes the case.
2016-11-24 22:44:26 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As a gay conservative I have to agree with you. My community brought the fight on itself. First there was the Supreme court in the state of MD that order the legislature to change the state constitution to allow gay marriage. (Isn't the supreme court supposed to interpret laws with the state Constitution as a guide, by ordering the change to the constitution they are changing the rules that govern themselves.)
Next the mayor of San Fransisco allowed gay marriage in direct opposition to a state law passed by the vote of the people of CA
2006-11-16 05:59:40 · answer #4 · answered by Rorshach4u 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
WRONG!!!!!!!!
Who the hell agreed with that?
Remy Rocks!
See Mark Foley, Conservative Catholic Priests (and the alter boys they love), and the last evangelical who got caught buying Meth and hiring gay strippers.
Another wards Conservative Republican talk a big game when it comes to being against gays. To bad that most conservative Republicans have been involved in homo activities.
TRUE TRUE TRUE
2006-11-16 05:50:02 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
See Mark Foley, Conservative Catholic Priests (and the alter boys they love), and the last evangelical who got caught buying Meth and hiring gay strippers.
Another wards Conservative Republican talk a big game when it comes to being against gays. To bad that most conservative Republicans have been involved in homo activities.
2006-11-16 05:30:37 · answer #6 · answered by REMY D RETURNS 2 · 5⤊ 2⤋
I always thought gays were liberal, but I had a job where the second boss, the hiring manager was gay, and he was a very strict conservative.
I couldn't believe it, but that place was sooo weird; it was soooooooo unstructured.
2006-11-16 05:44:16 · answer #7 · answered by pixles 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
When Dems mention Homosexuality they are seeking a friend, they might try to cloak it under free speech but their only motive is to find a new love.
2006-11-16 05:41:40 · answer #8 · answered by daydoom 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
I do agree.
I have a gay friend, and the frequency that she speaks of her sexuality doesn't even approach the libs obsession with gay-sex on this board.
2006-11-16 05:38:40 · answer #9 · answered by why? 1 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Because the ones saying "obsessed" and "free speech" are Dems.
2006-11-16 05:29:23 · answer #10 · answered by Kyrix 6 · 3⤊ 3⤋
You cons are the ones who can't seem to let go of this issue that you claim to abhor so much for no discernible reason.
2006-11-16 05:29:56 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋