English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

then by the same logic, shouldn't Wolfie Blitzer and Amy Goodman be brought up on treason charges?

After all it is they that continually give the terrorist air-time and grant them credibility by allowing them to "tell their side of the story". (Only a suicidal lib would think those that want to murder them have a legitimate argument)

In fact, could it not be offered for examination that CNN and Link TV's broadcast signal be blocked?

Come on libs, we are talking crimes against the state, are we not?

2006-11-16 05:14:18 · 10 answers · asked by why? 1 in Politics & Government Government

Devil Down, I've yet to see you construct one complex answer; do you have nothing substantive to offer?

2006-11-16 05:24:07 · update #1

I had no choice since one of you had my account deleted.
Free-speech strangling lib.
Don't blame my moniker for poor thought.

2006-11-16 05:31:51 · update #2

I obviously don't hate to the degree of organizing a group of my peers to get one of you libs banned from here.

Is this what you mean by "hate"?

2006-11-16 05:41:57 · update #3

I wish it were just that.
I got ran by the mob.
It wasn't just random reporting-- it was a concerted effort.
For the record, I can handle what I give out.
It's nothing personal, at least it's not to me

2006-11-16 05:50:37 · update #4

There Devil. I changed my ways.

2006-11-16 05:54:33 · update #5

Right on.
and I know you're far from lacking in wit

2006-11-16 06:02:32 · update #6

That made me laugh.
What a love fest

2006-11-16 06:29:12 · update #7

10 answers

So, *how* full of hate are you?
Have a nice life and don't bust a blood vessel!

....no one who calls themselves "libsrpigs" DESERVES a thoughtful and intelligent answer.
....hey, I blame your stupidity for your moniker. And I still say you're full of hate.
...If the members of this community find your questions and answers to be offensive, you *will* get reported, it's that simple. We're both getting reported for chatting right now!
....Those of us who choose to "dish it out" and rile people up have to accept the consequences. I get reported all the time!
....Peace out....I luv u too.
....now I feel like having a cigarette.

2006-11-16 05:19:34 · answer #1 · answered by thumbsdowndevil 3 · 2 1

I'll answer this question with my favorite joke

Someone please give Bush a bl0w job so that we can impeach him! Gimmie a break. I am a vet and I have had now 16 friends and 2 members of my family lost to a war that I STILL do not know why we are over there. When Monica and Bill got together, a strange thing, it didn't effect ANYTHING in my life.. What a surprise.

2006-11-16 15:03:23 · answer #2 · answered by babygyrl_nyc 5 · 1 0

Impeaching Bush will not have the legs to go anywhere. The Dems realize that many of them stamped their rubber stamp of approval on liberating Iraq by removing Saddam from power after reading the same intel reports Bush read. Impeaching him, therefore, would be an indicator of their own wrong-doing as well!

2006-11-16 13:21:41 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Bill Clinton was impeached over a bl0wj0b. Did anyone die as a result of that? No. Were any soldiers or children maimed, disfigured, or dismembered? No. Did he reveal the limitations of American power to hostile regimes? No. Did he allow North Korea and Iran to flaunt their nuclear programs, knowing that we would be too distracted to take any action? No.

Did Bush take us into an unnecessary war to oust a secular dictator we armed ourselves decades before? Yes. Did he invoke fears of a nuclear bomb detonating over New York to make his case? Yes. Did his team exaggerate the intelligence that agreed with them, while ignoring evidence to the contrary? Yes. Has he used his position and the circumstances of war to expand executive power? Yes. Has he woven a shroud of secrecy under the guise of "national security" to keep the public blind to what he and his cronies have been doing? Yes. Have civil liberties been systematically eroded under his watch? Yes.

Did Iraq have anything to do with 9/11? No.
Are we any safer? No.

It amazes me that right-wingers got all bent out of shape when Bill Clinton got his dick sucked, but Bush can sodomize whole country and y'all barely bat an eyelash. Indeed, you only seem to love him more! It's downright masochistic, if you ask me.

We liberals don't necessarily think that those who want to murder us have a legitimate argument (I don't think Ann Coulter has any legitimacy whatsoever, for example), but those of us who view the world and its people as complex beings would like to know what their beef is rather than just assume, "they want to hurt us because they are the bad guys." You see, we don't mind examining our own behavior in order to appreciate what we might be contributing to the situation. Everyone brings something to the picnic, after all, and we should take our share of responsibility.

I thought you conservative types were all about taking responsibility? Or is that just lip service?

2006-11-16 13:34:33 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 5 1

Stop being stupid and grasping at straws. The conservatives have to answer for their decisions. You lost get over it.

2006-11-16 13:18:43 · answer #5 · answered by courage 6 · 2 2

People in the US have the freedom to be traitors.
That's one freedom the Democrats will keep.

2006-11-16 13:19:13 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

Sorry...but this argument has NO logic.

2006-11-16 14:08:10 · answer #7 · answered by kissmybum 4 · 1 1

What would be their legal reason for it? Would they also impeach themselfs?

2006-11-16 13:16:38 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Yeaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhh righhhhhhhhhhhhtttttt...................

2006-11-16 13:17:10 · answer #9 · answered by FootballFan1012 6 · 1 1

There are plenty of reasons why Bush should be impeached that don't include Blitzer and Goodman.

Here are a few of them:

1) Seizing power to wage wars of aggression in defiance of the U.S. Constitution, the U.N. Charter and the rule of law; carrying out a massive assault on and occupation of Iraq, a country that was not threatening the United States, resulting in the death and maiming of tens of thousands of Iraqis, and thousands of U.S. G.I.s.

2) Lying to the people of the U.S., to Congress, and to the U.N., providing false and deceptive rationales for war.

3) Authorizing, ordering and condoning direct attacks on civilians, civilian facilities and locations where civilian casualties were unavoidable.

4) Instituting a secret and illegal wiretapping and spying operation against the people of the United States through the National Security Agency.

5) Threatening the independence and sovereignty of Iraq by belligerently changing its government by force and assaulting Iraq in a war of aggression.

6) Authorizing, ordering and condoning assassinations, summary executions, kidnappings, secret and other illegal detentions of individuals, torture and physical and psychological coercion of prisoners to obtain false statements concerning acts and intentions of governments and individuals and violating within the United States, and by authorizing U.S. forces and agents elsewhere, the rights of individuals under the First, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth and Eighth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

7) Making, ordering and condoning false statements and propaganda about the conduct of foreign governments and individuals and acts by U.S. government personnel; manipulating the media and foreign governments with false information; concealing information vital to public discussion and informed judgment concerning acts, intentions and possession, or efforts to obtain weapons of mass destruction in order to falsely create a climate of fear and destroy opposition to U.S. wars of aggression and first strike attacks.

8) Violations and subversions of the Charter of the United Nations and international law, both a part of the "Supreme Law of the land" under Article VI, paragraph 2, of the Constitution, in an attempt to commit with impunity crimes against peace and humanity and war crimes in wars and threats of aggression against Afghanistan, Iraq and others and usurping powers of the United Nations and the peoples of its nations by bribery, coercion and other corrupt acts and by rejecting treaties, committing treaty violations, and frustrating compliance with treaties in order to destroy any means by which international law and institutions can prevent, affect, or adjudicate the exercise of U.S. military and economic power against the international community.

9) Acting to strip United States citizens of their constitutional and human rights, ordering indefinite detention of citizens, without access to counsel, without charge, and without opportunity to appear before a civil judicial officer to challenge the detention, based solely on the discretionary designation by the Executive of a citizen as an "enemy combatant."

10) Ordering indefinite detention of non-citizens in the United States and elsewhere, and without charge, at the discretionary designation of the Attorney General or the Secretary of Defense.

11) Ordering and authorizing the Attorney General to override judicial orders of release of detainees under INS jurisdiction, even where the judicial officer after full hearing determines a detainee is wrongfully held by the government.

12) Authorizing secret military tribunals and summary execution of persons who are not citizens who are designated solely at the discretion of the Executive who acts as indicting official, prosecutor and as the only avenue of appellate relief.

13) Refusing to provide public disclosure of the identities and locations of persons who have been arrested, detained and imprisoned by the U.S. government in the United States, including in response to Congressional inquiry.

14) Use of secret arrests of persons within the United States and elsewhere and denial of the right to public trials.

15) Authorizing the monitoring of confidential attorney-client privileged communications by the government, even in the absence of a court order and even where an incarcerated person has not been charged with a crime.

16) Ordering and authorizing the seizure of assets of persons in the United States, prior to hearing or trial, for lawful or innocent association with any entity that at the discretionary designation of the Executive has been deemed "terrorist."

17) Engaging in criminal neglect in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, depriving thousands of people in Louisiana, Mississippi and other Gulf States of urgently needed support, causing mass suffering and unnecessary loss of life.

18) Institutionalization of racial and religious profiling and authorization of domestic spying by federal law enforcement on persons based on their engagement in noncriminal religious and political activity.

19) Refusal to provide information and records necessary and appropriate for the constitutional right of legislative oversight of executive functions.

20) Rejecting treaties protective of peace and human rights and abrogation of the obligations of the United States under, and withdrawal from, international treaties and obligations without consent of the legislative branch, and including termination of the ABM treaty between the United States and Russia, and rescission of the authorizing signature from the Treaty of Rome which served as the basis for the International Criminal Court

2006-11-16 14:13:01 · answer #10 · answered by truth seeker 7 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers