The morning after pill is the best thing because you take it BEFORE you are actually pregnant. It is actually a very strong dosage of birth control to PREVENT the pregnancy. It's just not a regular form of bith control. It is also convenient because you can now get it over-the -counter without prescription.
It wouldn't work if you are pregnant, so the two forms don't even compare.
With abortion, you are ending a pregnancy that is already present. It is very invasive and would hurt a lot. It also makes you more likely for miscarriage if you do want to have a baby later. You also would have to make a couple of appointments because they do not do the procedure on the first visit.
2006-11-16 06:47:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
The morning after pill. This gets rid of a possible preganancy, before it has taken place. It is a higher dose of a birth control pill, which stops the ovary from realeasing an egg, so that the sperm cannot implant itself. Therefore, it is NOT murder, because the pregnancy never occured. (its also now available over-the-counter in some states)
An abortion puts a lot of stress on the body, and kills an already developing baby.
I would also not keep the baby if I was in still in hs/college.
2006-11-16 07:55:37
·
answer #2
·
answered by countrygurl587 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
I would have to say the morning after pill because there is no certain way to know the pregnancy is evident. People rush for that pill in case of if they were raped or if their birth control method could have failed, (ie. Condom broke) At the time this pill is given, you wouldn't even KNOW if you were or weren't preggo. Just a precaution.
As for abortion, you KNOW you are expecting, and it just doesn't seem morally right.
But either way, for myself, I wouldn't do either method. I would keep the baby!!
2006-11-16 05:48:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
In my current situation- keep the baby. If there was a reason for me not wanting a pregnancy- morning after pill.
2006-11-16 10:01:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by Amanda D 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The morning after pill is a lot less stressful on the body. Cheaper too. I have never used either but working in the medical field- I hear about it all...
2006-11-16 05:18:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by jeweledfruit 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Neither. The "morning after" pill may prevent pregnancy, but it may also cause an early abortion by preventing the 7- to 10-day-old unborn child from implanting in his or her mother's womb. For more on this, see:
http://www.morningafterpill.org/index.htm
Intentionally killing any innocent human being at any stage of life is murder. For more on all aspects of abortion, see http://Abort73.com
2006-11-17 06:14:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Call me anything you like, but I would wait until I was married to have sex, so it would be with someone I would love, and would keep the baby. If it was rape. . . morning after pill. If it was too late for map, having the child and giving it up for adoption.
2006-11-16 11:23:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by i ♥ sarcasm 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
1st. im voicing my opinion. YES i know that abortion means to kill an unborn baby. BUT, which would you rather have? a child who is anywhere from a newborn to 3 yrs old to be put in an agency and never know who their real father or mother was? and what if they cant find a family? ive heard of places that (sometimes) keep the kid until theyre a legal age and then send them out on their own. OR (somehow) save the baby by killing it? (i know that in its own way its wrong)
2nd. OR dont have sex or wear protection
2006-11-16 10:14:34
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
keep the baby, the morning after pill doesn nothing but abortions
2006-11-16 20:05:08
·
answer #9
·
answered by ♥ gina ♥ 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
At my age Morning after or Abortion ( I am Pro Choice )
But If I was married and ready I would keep it
2006-11-16 11:05:14
·
answer #10
·
answered by Emizzle 2
·
0⤊
0⤋