IS THIS WHY NEO-LIBS HATE THE MILITARY aND THE SECOND AMENDMENT?

Question

because they both stand sentinel against the blasphemous left's attempt to sex-change our Capitalistic Republic into a Socialist Worker's Nightmare?

Answer 1

The "Libs" love the use of force, so they really don't have any problem with the military and guns, so long as they are in control of them.

You see socialism and communism is the forced "redistribution," i.e. theft, of wealth, social status, and education/careers. All force requires "arms" (i.e. guns in these modern times) and a militant police force.

What they don't like is that guns in the hands of Americans means forceful resistance to their forceful socialist agendas. They don't like the US military because every soldier is sworn to defend the constitution, including the 2nd ammendment, and therefore to advance individual freedom. Additionally, it teaches civilians (all who volunteer to serve) how to fight with modern weaponry and then it allows them to return to civilian status (beyond the control of government).

Answer 2

Many of their viewpoints come from an idealistic world, where aggression, threat, and terrorism do not exist. In the real world a military provides for a common defense against all enemies foreign and domestic, and the framers of the constitution had the proper forbearance to know that if the government had a monopoly on guns, even the concept of revolution was impossible.

Answer 3

i like the indisputable fact that the protection stress demonstrates the effectiveness of socialized coverage. in spite of everything, that's supported via tax money and run via the government, or maybe with some inefficiencies, it runs rather nicely. in reality, our socialized police stress and hearth struggling with additionally paintings rather nicely. EDIT: As to the remark of my seething critic under - the Walter Reed scandal actual demonstrates precisely how useful socialized coverage is. there have been undesirable situations, people complained, and that they are being addressed. needless to say each corporation will make errors, yet had that been a private company, they might have purely listened to stockholder court docket cases, no longer those of the customary citizen. yet at WR, there grew to become right into a project -- there grew to become into public outcry -- and because it grew to become right into a public scientific institution action grew to become into taken. additionally, i might upload that Matt, you won't be able to have it the two methods. in case you think that the protection stress, police, and hearth are all useful and helpful, then you definately won't be able to arbitrarily brush aside public wellbeing care. Or, on account which you needless to say have faith each little thing the government touches is terrible, you're able to have faith that the protection stress is in a similar style terrible. or you ought to purely come out and admit your hypocrisy suited now.

Answer 4

Because liberals are too afraid to go into the Military.
They are jealous of Real Men.

Answer 5

thinking the 2nd amendment should be used correctly and choosing to use the military in a different way does not imply hate.. but since you are obviously full of the idealism of hate you will obviously think whatever you want :)

Answer 6

To the cut & paster above me:

I feel better knowing Kinkos has competent workers like you.

Wow, thumbs down.

Guess Hitler, Nazi and Bush are a better fit?

Answer 7

The libs know they are runing the country to a degree in which revolution is certain. They want the citizens disarmed to try and prevent this.

Answer 8

Yes.

Answer 9

Actually they hate them because people who like them like all caps titles... which is the real root of all evil.

Answer 10

This is your brain on drugs