If he did Kill Nicole, Where's the Evidence(Besides the Planted evidence)? How bad of a case did the police have if there was a need to plant evidence? When a crime is commited theres always evidence CSI taught me that.
The Man was never proven guilty. The book is a Ballsy/ super insensitve move but that doens't make him a killer. He may have secured a first class trip to Hell though.
2006-11-16 03:19:42 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
No I'm not. I think he is guilty and I'm not supporting anything he does.
2006-11-16 03:21:24 · answer #1 · answered by Nico 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
permit's commence by potential of clearing the air - OJ won't make any money. A federal choose ruled that the Goldman kinfolk owns all rights to the e book and the rights to OJ's likeness and appearances in/for the e book and for any next advertising of the e book. whilst the e book replaced into first meant to return out I reported i does no longer purchase it or examine it. Now that the Goldman kinfolk has all the rights to the e book and OJ heavily isn't making a single penny off of any revenues or advertising, my morbid interest would get the better of me.
2016-12-10 10:10:40 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree with you about the evidence thing and the fact that he was never proven guilty. The evidence they had was sketchy at best. But I still think that book is in bad taste.
2006-11-16 11:22:15 · answer #3 · answered by SexyLady 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I do not know if you are old enough to remember the trial, but the DNA evidence was overwhelming. There was no proof that it was planted. Also, innocent men do not get in a Bronco and head for Mexico!
2006-11-16 03:23:31 · answer #4 · answered by Tony M 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He slid..plain and simple. I think you might be one of the ....12-15 people who actually believe this fairy tale that he is innocent. Not a chance, this scumbag has gotten away with murder for fun and profit and he is secretly laughing at all the fools who still believe he didn't do it. I wouldn't cross the street to pee on him if he were on fire. I used to like the guy before he murdered his ex-wife and an innocent bystander. And Johnny Cochran is no better. Nothing to do with race...everything to do with playing the system and getting away with murder.
2006-11-16 03:25:18 · answer #5 · answered by Rich B 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
IMHO there was evidence enough to convict him....it just was presented very poorly by the prosecutors.
Also they hadn't done their homework, cuz, if I remember correctly, they where totally gobsmacked when the defense laywers played the race-card so efficiently with one of the prosecutor's whitnesses. (sp??) I forgot his name....I think it was something like Mike Fur......something.
I will certainly not read OJ's book, I think the money he's getting for it is blood-money.
2006-11-16 03:55:13 · answer #6 · answered by Joshua 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely not. I wouldn't support that sleasy, slimey, bag of garbage. He's the most disgusting person on earth. He was acquitted - doesn't mean he's innocent. I don't think Hell even wants him.
And I don't understand why you'd even waste a question on that slime ball.
2006-11-16 03:38:35 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's a good thing to protect your own but come-on, the guy is as guilty as WHITE MILK.
2006-11-16 04:04:09 · answer #8 · answered by Gabriele 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, no and NO! It's just a tactic to recoup some of his financial losses. What about his children? Doesn't he think of them? He's a pathetic loser and should be in prison.
2006-11-16 03:23:29 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would not waste my time or money on that fool.
2006-11-16 03:26:55 · answer #10 · answered by Miss Mouse 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋