English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

IMPRISONMENT WITHOUT TRIAL (OR EVEN A OFFENCE) TO BE REINTRODUCED

ANYBODY THE GOVERNMENT DOES NOT LIKE CAN NOW BE IMPRISONED: NOT JUST TERRORISTS (= FOREIGN LOOKING PEOPLE THEY DISLIKE)

Mental health row set to reopen

Mental health campaigners are concerned
Controversial laws allowing people with untreatable personality disorders to be detained, even if they have not committed a crime, are to be revived.
The draft Mental Health Bill was axed in March amid much opposition.

But some of the key proposals are to be retained in a forthcoming bill promised in the Queen's Speech which will update the 1983 Mental Health Act.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6147880.stm

Tony Blair is a power-hungry pyschopath. He is the first person I would lock up!

2006-11-16 00:30:37 · 10 answers · asked by Perseus 3 in News & Events Current Events

10 answers

He,s well on the way to doing it , BUT he will have a problem because it will be the whole of the Indigenous Population of Great Britain , who he has turned against and obviously Despises , However his Problem at the Moment is there is no room in the Prisons for all of us , Perhaps he will start Shipping us out to Iran , Iraq or some other wonderfull destination , which he in his twisted mind ,considers Suitable .???

2006-11-16 01:03:07 · answer #1 · answered by ? 5 · 1 0

Our government seems to be quite deterrmined to make, and keep,us afraid. It has continuously fed us with false information, backed up by dubious statistics, that seem to say we are under an ever increasing threat from numerous sources, from terrorists to kids misbehaving. Facts tend to demonstrate the opposite, that we are more secure in every area than we have ever been. The press and TV do their share in headlining, over-reporting and sensationalising items of news that, several years ago, would not have made a two line story hidden in the darkest recesses of the inner pages. It surprises me not at all that the next parliament is proposing to introduce yet more legislation which will erode freedoms so hard won by our forbears on our behalf. We let them, and swallow it all meekly, in the mistaken belief that those erosions may be regrettable, but are necesary. Many of them are not. The insidious creep of control is what it is all about, and most of us will be unaware that we have too few freedoms left to live an open life until those freedoms have gone for good. The government runs things on OUR behalf, and with OUR consent. It is therefore up to US, by regularly badgering OUR MPs and press NOT to erode those freedoms, to make OUR voices heard. If WE don't speak up we can hardly be surprised if the government mistakes our silence for assent.

2006-11-16 00:52:24 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Erm, don't understand the question, you seem to be trying to make two different points on very separate issues.

The right to detain suspected Terrorists if that is your point is vital in protecting the safety of the general public (including you) and in the interests of national security. They do not just randomly lock people up 'for looking foreign'.

I don't actually think Tony Blair is a power hungry Psychopath who can lock anyone up and brainwash them with drugs, and I don't think many intelligent people do either.

The second point you make about detaining mental health patients may be valid - perhaps you should have presented the first point as eloquently - or have you cut and pasted?

2006-11-16 00:44:00 · answer #3 · answered by derbyandrew 4 · 0 1

he's under W's table giving him a Lewinsky. i be attentive to that become crude and tasteless, yet pondering the duo’s previous of cuddling as much as a minimum of one yet another no count how incorrect the different become, I only could no longer face as much as.

2016-12-30 13:18:54 · answer #4 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

Yeah, let's have a clampdown, no more fooking about with terrorists, lefties, the great unwashed and chavs, bang em all up and brainwash em.

2006-11-16 00:52:13 · answer #5 · answered by heafie69 2 · 1 0

Good eough for George Bush....good enough for Tony Blair.

2006-11-16 00:32:46 · answer #6 · answered by Judy the Wench 6 · 1 0

Why do you think Cherie has been so docile lately?
And as for Ewan (or however they spell it) :dropped off the radar!
Must be drugs and brainwashing.

2006-11-16 01:26:21 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Those that persecute others.... tend to hate themselves most of all, usually because they see parts of themselves in the person they are judging.....

2006-11-16 00:36:13 · answer #8 · answered by Mintjulip 6 · 1 0

zimbabwe is a better place !

< besides, royal treatment from mugabe awaits him >

2006-11-16 00:36:18 · answer #9 · answered by sεαη 7 · 1 0

No he's the 2nd....Cherie should be first!

2006-11-16 00:38:47 · answer #10 · answered by grumpyoldman 4 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers